Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-09-06 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:16 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On 09/06/2011 02:55 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > > John Madden wrote: > > > > > It's well worth your time to maintain your own compiles and even > > > > > packages of Cyrus because the package maintainers can't keep up.

Re: quota bug in 2.4 ?

2011-09-06 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:23:15PM +0300, Eero Hänninen wrote: > Is this normal, or known bug, or need to be fill in bugzilla ? :) Filed and fixed for 2.4.11 - which will be out real-soon-now[tm]. Bron. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.ed

quota bug in 2.4 ?

2011-09-06 Thread Eero Hänninen
Hi.. In some reasons my cyrus host quotas.db has crashed, so I have recovered them by setting quotas again over IMAP port with script and then run quota -f locally. In fixing process I discovered that if I have two users like bar and bar1 and bar have quota lets say for example 10mb and bar1 ha

Cyrus IMAP Packaging (was: Re: cpu and cyrus)

2011-09-06 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
John Madden wrote: > > Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somewhat > > of a faux pas, and seriously frowned upon by yours sincerely. > > It's not that you can't keep up, it's that you don't keep up. The > reasons behind the lag are usually quite understandable, but re

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-09-06 Thread John Madden
> Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somewhat > of a faux pas, and seriously frowned upon by yours sincerely. It's not that you can't keep up, it's that you don't keep up. The reasons behind the lag are usually quite understandable, but regardless, those who need th

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-09-06 Thread Bron Gondwana
On 09/06/2011 02:55 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: John Madden wrote: > It's well worth your time to maintain your own compiles and even > packages of Cyrus because the package maintainers can't keep up. > Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somew

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-09-06 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
John Madden wrote: > It's well worth your time to maintain your own compiles and even > packages of Cyrus because the package maintainers can't keep up. > Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somewhat of a faux pas, and seriously frowned upon by yours sincerely. Kind

Re: Bulk deletion of mailbox ACLs under Cyrus 2.4.4

2011-09-06 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 06/09/11 13:29, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Uch, mind where I said "just that", I neglected to mention the attached > script only removes ACL entries for which the identifier (assuming it's > an individual identifier, admittedly) has no corresponding mailbox. > > > My apologies

Re: Bulk deletion of mailbox ACLs under Cyrus 2.4.4

2011-09-06 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Bron Gondwana wrote: > > The correct way[tm] is to iterate over all the mailboxes and do a > > "setacl" for each one you want to change, probably using an external > > script that talks IMAP. > > While obviously needing some work, I've attached a script

Re: Bulk deletion of mailbox ACLs under Cyrus 2.4.4

2011-09-06 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
Bron Gondwana wrote: > The correct way[tm] is to iterate over all the mailboxes and do a > "setacl" for each one you want to change, probably using an external > script that talks IMAP. > While obviously needing some work, I've attached a script that -I think- does just that. Kind regards, Jer