I was under the impression that Cyrus Murder handled the horizontal
scale out of mailboxes across multiple servers.
I have not yet needed to scale up to the point where this would be an
issue but I would love to know what the answer would be.
On 06/12/2016 10:14 AM, Bron Gondwana via
Funny you should ask :)
http://asg.andrew.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.cyrus-devel=4939
I definitely have plans of allowing everything to be written back in a reliable
way so that losing an IMAP server is guaranteed(within the bounds of software
reliability and all the parts
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:18:12PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to our systems people, we should scale out instead, the way
> Exchange 2013 and Dovecot Pro apparently do. The idea, as I understand it,
> is to have multiple backends that all provide access
Hi,
our systems guys keep telling us that we are doing things in an
old-fashioned way and should get with the program.
We are currently using a single Cyrus server with roughly 13 TB of storage
provided by a SAN. We used to have a Red Hat High Availability cluster, but
we traded that in for
