Re: prefork and IPv6

2016-06-09 Thread Andrew Morgan via Info-cyrus
that cyrus-master seems to fork the configured amount of "prefork" daemons twice. One half listening on IPv4 and the other half on IPv6. Since IPv6 is practically never used from our frontends they stay forever doing nothing on the backends. Is there some reasonable way to prevent this

prefork and IPv6

2016-06-09 Thread Wolfgang Breyha via Info-cyrus
efork" daemons twice. One half listening on IPv4 and the other half on IPv6. Since IPv6 is practically never used from our frontends they stay forever doing nothing on the backends. Is there some reasonable way to prevent this other than setting prefork=0? I'm only using SERVICE entries lik

Re: IPv6

2016-04-11 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
Thanks, I'm fine with that wording. --On 6. April 2016 um 12:33:08 +1000 ellie timoney wrote: Oh yeah, of course. I've added the following to man/master.8 for future releases: Services added or modified to listen on a privileged port may not be able to bind the port,

Re: IPv6

2016-04-05 Thread ellie timoney via Info-cyrus
On 5. April 2016 um 14:33:46 +1000 ellie timoney <el...@fastmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > Sebastian, is there anything you tried that *didn't* work, and if so, > >> > what happened? > >> > >> The only thing I tried that didn't work was to add a IPv6 listener

Re: IPv6

2016-04-05 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
Hi Ellie, --On 5. April 2016 um 14:33:46 +1000 ellie timoney <el...@fastmail.com> wrote: > Sebastian, is there anything you tried that *didn't* work, and if so, > what happened? The only thing I tried that didn't work was to add a IPv6 listener and to HUP the master process.

Re: IPv6

2016-04-04 Thread ellie timoney via Info-cyrus
Hi Sebastian, > > Sebastian, is there anything you tried that *didn't* work, and if so, > > what happened? > > The only thing I tried that didn't work was to add a IPv6 listener and to > HUP the master process. The manpage for master reads (in my version): > >

Re: IPv6

2016-03-29 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
Hi Ellie, --On 29. März 2016 um 12:30:34 +1100 ellie timoney <el...@fastmail.com> wrote: Ellie, can you please fix the listen statement to accept correctly bracketed ipv6 and backport to at least 2.5 and 2.4, shouldn't be many changes in that code. I don't think there's anything

Re: IPv6

2016-03-28 Thread ellie timoney via Info-cyrus
> Ellie, can you please fix the listen statement to accept correctly > bracketed ipv6 and backport to at least 2.5 and 2.4, shouldn't be many > changes in that code. I don't think there's anything to fix here. The code looks fine as is, just docs missing. Unless we want to e

Re: IPv6

2016-03-27 Thread Bron Gondwana via Info-cyrus
Ellie, can you please fix the listen statement to accept correctly bracketed ipv6 and backport to at least 2.5 and 2.4, shouldn't be many changes in that code. Nicola, can you check that we document how it's working now, and of course the fixed version :) Bron (on phone in bush somewhere

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO via Info-cyrus
address ':' port > * '[' ipv4-address ']' > * '[' ipv4-address ']' ':' port > * '[' ipv6-address ']' > * '[' ipv6-address ']' ':' port The `ipv6-address ':' port' notation is also accepted. However, it is not mentioned even in the comment. Hagedorn> Thank you! Perhaps that should go

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
quot;listen" parameter as one of the forms: * * hostname * hostname ':' port * ipv4-address * ipv4-address ':' port * '[' ipv4-address ']' * '[' ipv4-address ']' ':' port * '[' ipv6-address ']' * '[' ipv6-address ']' ':' port info-cyrus> I will now try a host name with bot A and records

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO via Info-cyrus
Hi, >>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:03:10 +0100 >>>>> Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus <info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu> said: info-cyrus> Yes, I do (multi-homed system), and I have just tried it on a test info-cyrus> system. Using literal IPv6 adress

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
--On 23. März 2016 um 15:41:25 +0100 lst_hoe02--- via Info-cyrus <info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: we've been using IPv6 for a few years now, but so far we haven't used it with Cyrus. Now we want to, and I have a few questions: Is it correct that if we use host names in the

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread lst_hoe02--- via Info-cyrus
Zitat von Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus <info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu>: Hi, we've been using IPv6 for a few years now, but so far we haven't used it with Cyrus. Now we want to, and I have a few questions: Is it correct that if we use host names in the listen statement and

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Eric Luyten via Info-cyrus
Please disregard my previous comment, misread your original post. Need coffee. Eric Luyten. On Wed, March 23, 2016 3:27 pm, Eric Luyten via Info-cyrus wrote: <> Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To

Re: IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Eric Luyten via Info-cyrus
On Wed, March 23, 2016 3:13 pm, Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus wrote: > Hi, > > > we've been using IPv6 for a few years now, but so far we haven't used it with > Cyrus. Now we want to, and I have a few questions: > > > Is it correct that if we use host names in the

IPv6

2016-03-23 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
Hi, we've been using IPv6 for a few years now, but so far we haven't used it with Cyrus. Now we want to, and I have a few questions: Is it correct that if we use host names in the listen statement and add a record to the DNS that Cyrus will automatically listen to both the IPv4