Re: Imapsync alternative?

2012-01-24 Thread Marc Patermann
Hi, Paul van der Vlis schrieb (23.01.2012 13:07 Uhr): > I've used in the past imapsync for mailbox migrations, but sometimes I > found problems. For the latest version I have to pay. I can understand > it from the view of the developer, maybe I will pay him for the latest > version. But I will lo

Re: Imapsync alternative?

2012-01-23 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 23-01-12 13:41, Michael Menge schreef: > Hi, > > Quoting Paul van der Vlis : > >> Hello, >> >> I've used in the past imapsync for mailbox migrations, but sometimes I >> found problems. For the latest version I have to pay. I can understand >> it from the view of the developer, maybe I will pay

Re: Imapsync alternative?

2012-01-23 Thread Scott Lambert
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:07:58PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > I've used in the past imapsync for mailbox migrations, but sometimes I > found problems. For the latest version I have to pay. I can understand > it from the view of the developer, maybe I will pay him for the latest >

Re: Imapsync alternative?

2012-01-23 Thread Michael Menge
Hi, Quoting Paul van der Vlis : Hello, I've used in the past imapsync for mailbox migrations, but sometimes I found problems. For the latest version I have to pay. I can understand it from the view of the developer, maybe I will pay him for the latest version. But I will look for alternatives

Imapsync alternative?

2012-01-23 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, I've used in the past imapsync for mailbox migrations, but sometimes I found problems. For the latest version I have to pay. I can understand it from the view of the developer, maybe I will pay him for the latest version. But I will look for alternatives first, preferable those who are in D