Re: Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-29 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 08:53:12PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: > On 27 Mar 2010, at 20:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > I had guessed, though perhaps I had hoped that something would simply > > tell me that instead of giving odd errors that made me think that I > > had > > misconfigured somethi

Re: Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-28 Thread Wesley Craig
On 27 Mar 2010, at 20:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I had guessed, though perhaps I had hoped that something would simply > tell me that instead of giving odd errors that made me think that I > had > misconfigured something. I agree. I think it's probably in the release notes, but since it'

Re: Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "BG" == Bron Gondwana writes: BG> The advantage of reconstructing (if you choose that BG> path instead, heaps more IO use though) is that you'll get real SHA1 BG> GUIDs rather than padded GUIDs. Not a huge deal - though I'll BG> probably force the SHA1 calculation in the 2.4 upgrade, becau

Re: Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-27 Thread Raphael Jaffey
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > [Forgot to send this to the list; sorry. > >> "BG" == Bron Gondwana writes: > > BG> No, sorry. > > I figured as much; I backed off to 2.3.7 on the new machine so that I > could get a good replica. > > BG> Replication across versions is trick at the best of t

Re: Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-27 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
[Forgot to send this to the list; sorry. > "BG" == Bron Gondwana writes: BG> No, sorry. I figured as much; I backed off to 2.3.7 on the new machine so that I could get a good replica. BG> Replication across versions is trick at the best of times, and BG> you're talking about versions 3 and

Re: Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-27 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:19:06AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > So, is it expected to be generally possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to > 2.3.16? If so, would anyone have any idea what I might be doing wrong > here? If it's not possible, would it be reasonable to migrate initially > using

Not possible to replicate from 2.3.7 to 2.3.16?

2010-03-26 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
I'm trying to move my mail services to both new hardware and a new Cyrus version. This involves a change in architecture from i386 to x86_64. I was going for what looked like the simplest method: set the new server as a replica, let everything replicate, then quickly shut things down, configure t