Re: RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-08-09 Thread kael
On 07/30/2012 03:07 AM, Greg Banks wrote: > I should mention also that Bron has been talking for some time now about > storing modseqs on per-message annotations as a way to make replication > more efficient. I think this is an excellent idea and is easy enough to > do, because we have a good mods

Re: RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-07-29 Thread Greg Banks
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012, at 09:36 AM, Greg Banks wrote: > G'day, > > On 30/07/2012, at 7:20, kael wrote: > > > On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723 > > > > > > Implementing unsolicited METADATA responses at the same time would be

Re: RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-07-29 Thread Greg Banks
G'day, On 30/07/2012, at 7:20, kael wrote: > On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723 > > > Implementing unsolicited METADATA responses at the same time would be > awesome, though. Sheesh, give 'em an inch... When I was doing the la

Re: RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-07-29 Thread kael
On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723 Thanks. >> If these bugs are confirmed, it'd be great to have them fixed before >> this extension is widely adopted (there are lots of potential, imo), >> otherwise client implementations might be b

Re: RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-07-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012, at 08:14 PM, kael wrote: > Two errata were published for RFC 5464 > , and apparently > Cyrus implementation of the METADATA extension is buggy in the regard to > these errata. https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cg

Re: RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-07-25 Thread kael
On 07/25/2012 08:14 PM, kael wrote: > Two errata were published for RFC 5464 > , and apparently > Cyrus implementation of the METADATA extension is buggy in the regard to > these errata. Tested on FastMail.fm. -- kael Cyrus Home Page: h

RFC 5464 IMAP METADATA Extension Errata

2012-07-25 Thread kael
Hello, Two errata were published for RFC 5464 , and apparently Cyrus implementation of the METADATA extension is buggy in the regard to these errata. - ErratumID 2785 : a GETMETADATA (MAXSIZE 1024) "INBOX" (/shared/comment /private/comment

Re: RFC 5464 : IMAP METADATA extension

2010-11-21 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On Sunday, November 21, 2010 09:41:58 pm Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:24:02PM +0100, kael wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've installed Cyrus 2.4.4 and looking at the METADATA extension, I > > realized only draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-07 is implemented. > > Yeah, it still does.

Re: RFC 5464 : IMAP METADATA extension

2010-11-21 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:24:02PM +0100, kael wrote: > Hello, > > I've installed Cyrus 2.4.4 and looking at the METADATA extension, I > realized only draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-07 is implemented. Yeah, it still does. > There's a patch from the Kolab folks (haven't tried yet), and according

RFC 5464 : IMAP METADATA extension

2010-11-21 Thread kael
Hello, I've installed Cyrus 2.4.4 and looking at the METADATA extension, I realized only draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-07 is implemented. There's a patch from the Kolab folks (haven't tried yet), and according to a discussion on the list from November 2009 a patch has been developed by Fastmai