Re: sieve question: archive script

2009-10-28 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:51:45 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: Subject: Re: sieve question: archive script > > Bron Gondwana wrote: > > Sieve only runs during the LMTP phase. It doesn't move messages. > > > > I'd say go Perl + IMAP. It's pretty easy. > >

Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-06 Thread Jan Schneider
Though it's usually: fileinto "user.fred.Spam" Zitat von Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Assuming that user has the 'p' right to user.fred.INBOX.Spam then yes. > If they don't have the 'p' right, the mail will just be sent in limbo. > On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Bob Bob wrote: > Hi

Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-05 Thread Scott Likens
another ... Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: July 5, 2008 3:32:02 AM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question Dear Business Partner, for months the mails of our user have been sent to you from our new Domain. This Domain has now been

Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-05 Thread Scott Likens
If someone can please remove this user from the mailing lists? Thanks :) Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: July 4, 2008 3:54:47 PM PDT To: "Scott Likens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question Sorry. Your message could not

Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-04 Thread Scott Likens
Assuming that user has the 'p' right to user.fred.INBOX.Spam then yes. If they don't have the 'p' right, the mail will just be sent in limbo. On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Bob Bob wrote: Hi all Cant seem to find an answer on this one.. I should experiment but would like some advance info. C

Simple Sieve question

2008-07-04 Thread Bob Bob
Hi all Cant seem to find an answer on this one.. I should experiment but would like some advance info. Can sieve "fileinto" into a mailbox folder that is not at or below the Inbox?. If so what would the syntax look like; ie fileinto "/user.fred.INBOX.Spam" instead of just "INBOX.Spam" as us

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Frederik Vervaet wrote: Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few) release(s) ? Its not tremendously likely, no. Adding sieve extensions makes the code worse and worse the more we add. Given the propensity of sieve extensions to never get "locked"

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Frederik Vervaet wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: Frederik Vervaet wrote: Any pointers ? There are some drafts of Sieve extensions for tweaking headers, but Cyrus doesn't support any of them yet. Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few) release(s) ? I

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Frederik Vervaet
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: Frederik Vervaet wrote: Any pointers ? There are some drafts of Sieve extensions for tweaking headers, but Cyrus doesn't support any of them yet. Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few) release(s) ? -- Frederik Vervaet --- C

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Frederik Vervaet wrote: I'm looking into adding some filtering to my postfix/cyrus server. I allready got sieve working nicely but i was wondering if sieve supports some actions i'm used to having on a server with procmail. For example : editing mails, adding headers , removing text/headers etc

Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Frederik Vervaet
I'm looking into adding some filtering to my postfix/cyrus server. I allready got sieve working nicely but i was wondering if sieve supports some actions i'm used to having on a server with procmail. For example : editing mails, adding headers , removing text/headers etc ? Any pointers ? -- Fre

Re: Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > Hi, > > It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension > will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver > when vacation match ? > > Thanks ! You could add an explicit "discard;" after the vacation to do

Re: Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension > will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver > when vacation match ? is: if test { vacation ...; discard; } what you mean? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Etienne Goyer
Hi, It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver when vacation match ? Thanks ! -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc. http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Naive Sieve question

2003-06-25 Thread David Carter
I'm still relatively new to Sieve (we've been using Exim filter files up to now), so I suspect I'm missing something obvious here. What is the recommended way to filter mail delivery reports? I'm the postmaster for a 25k user mail system, and really don't want all of the bounces in my primary INBO

Quick sieve question

2002-12-12 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Does sieve support filing incoming mail into two mailboxes? I have a user who want to file much of his mail into one backup folder and then process it with other filters later. However, I'm finding that l

Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Ken Murchison
eve implementations which have a body test, and they are non-standard. > -Original Message- > From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: November 26, 2002 2:51 PM > To: Su Li > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains > > Su L

RE: Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Su Li
Thanks a lot Ken, So there is not way I can filter according to the content of the BODY. How about "exits"? Su -Original Message- From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 26, 2002 2:51 PM To: Su Li Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sieve questi

Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Su Li wrote: > > Hi, > > In Sieve I saw a lot of "header :contains ...". I wonder, if a user needs to do some >filtering when 'body contains "test filter"', is there some thing like "body" to >replace "header"? No. There is an I-D for a body extension, but its not implemented in cmu-sieve.

Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Su Li
Hi, In Sieve I saw a lot of "header :contains ...". I wonder, if a user needs to do some filtering when 'body contains "test filter"', is there some thing like "body" to replace "header"? So I can do: if body :contains "From" { discard; } Thanks, Su

Re: Sieve Question

2001-07-20 Thread Ken Murchison
"John C. Amodeo" wrote: > > Greetings, > > This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve > Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought... > > Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we > have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that

Sieve Question

2001-07-20 Thread John C. Amodeo
Greetings, This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought... Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that all point to the same account, and what I a

Re: SIEVE question

2001-03-07 Thread Ken Murchison
Ralf Haferkamp wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to write a SIEVE filterrule that checks all mail headers for > a specific string? Something like: > > if header :contains [*] "blahblah"{ > discard; ^ > }| > | >

SIEVE question

2001-03-07 Thread Ralf Haferkamp
Hi, Is it possible to write a SIEVE filterrule that checks all mail headers for a specific string? Something like: if header :contains [*] "blahblah"{ discard; ^ }| | |___