On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:13:14 +0100
Binarus wrote:
> I do not know if this is still the case, but this experience shows
> that you should test *every possible client software* you (the
> customer) could use with Dovecot, and that you should set up all IMAP
> features and test if any actions you wil
On 01/19/2018 07:50 AM, Nic Bernstein wrote:
> I'm sorry, and don't wish to start a flame war here, but can't just let
> this comment pass. Fastmail are dedicated to improving the
> documentation of Cyrus, and have on staff a person, Nicola Nye
> , for that specific reason. They've spent a
> bun
Am Freitag, 19. Januar 2018, 12:29:03 CET schrieb Patrick Goetz:
> That makes the choice kind of clear, in my mind. AFAIK Dovecot is
> developed by just one person (or at the very least a small team) of
> volunteer developers. If he/they get bored and move on to something
> else ... Meanwhile,
On 01/19/2018 05:29 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
The biggest ongoing problem with Cyrus is the documentation, not that
it's harder to install. Cyrus is, if anything, easier to install than
Dovecot (modulo distro packaging, which is the main difference here).
The Dovecot guy writes very good docume
Op 17-01-18 om 12:33 schreef Sebastian Hagedorn: >> Hi,
A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
My question: What's better in Cyrus?
This is terribly OCD, but I can't stand the maildir message formatting
Dovecot uses. Ugh, how inel
Op 17-01-18 om 12:33 schreef Sebastian Hagedorn:
> Hi,
>
>> A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
>> Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
>>
>> My question: What's better in Cyrus?
>
> I thought the plan was to answer that question on the website, but I
> guess that hasn't h
On 17.01.2018 11:56, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
> Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
>
> My question: What's better in Cyrus?
Please note that what I am reporting here has happened some years ago,
so the situation may be different now
My 2 cents...
> I have been asked to provide support to a Rube Goldberg style of mail setup
> and trying to track the installation and configuration of dovecot in a
> multidomain, virtual-user setup was crazy.
> It seemed like there were dozens of config files spread over the file system.
I
> > I'd say it's the better choice for large-scale deployments with
> > tens and hundreds of thousands of users.
> Cyrus does not require creating users on the mail server which I
> have always believed is a big security plus.
+1 Cyrus having its own identity management has been a big plus; the
On 01/17/2018 06:33 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
Hi,
A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
My question: What's better in Cyrus?
I thought the plan was to answer that question on the website, but I
guess that hasn't happened yet – a
In addition to the things already mentioned, you get native CalDAV,
CardDAV, and JMAP support.
On 01/17/2018 05:56 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
My question: What's better in Cyrus?
I use
Hi,
A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
My question: What's better in Cyrus?
I thought the plan was to answer that question on the website, but I guess
that hasn't happened yet – at least I couldn't find anything.
I'd say it's th
Hello,
A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with
Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus.
My question: What's better in Cyrus?
I use Cyrus because Dovecot did not excist at the time I wanted to go
away from Washington IMAP. An important reason to stay with Cyrus is
this mailing lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
