Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Rob McMahon wrote: it. It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? As long as you add a policy that Trash gets wiped

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Simon Matter
I know this is an old problem, but I'd like your thoughts. We need to apply quotas to our students for the obvious reasons, but face the old issue of having them hit their quotas and then being unable to move forward because deleting mail from the client (SquirrelMail) typically means moving

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 + Rob McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? Might as

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Rob McMahon
Joseph Brennan wrote: It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? Might as well just double their quota. They could create a whole set