notbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2006-06-08, David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Emacs when it's added them in as well. XEmacs's other advantage is
>> that it comes with an add-on bundle of approximately every elisp
>> package out there;
>
> Well, it used to. No longer.
On 2006-06-08, David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emacs when it's added them in as well. XEmacs's other advantage is
> that it comes with an add-on bundle of approximately every elisp
> package out there;
Well, it used to. No longer. Now all those packages must be added by
the u
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The function `rmail-dont-reply-to' in XEmacs 21.4 (in `mail-utils.el')
> doesn't honor `user-mail-address', it only looks at the result of
> `user-login-name' (see `M-: (user-login-name) RET'). Probably your
> username matched the old address, but does
On Thu, Jun 08 2006, Barbara Koenig wrote:
> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ,[ (info "(message)Wide Reply") ]
>> |Addresses that match the `message-dont-reply-to-names' regular
>> | expression will be removed from the `Cc' header.
>> `
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. All t
David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> Now is this plain eMacs?
>>
>> Isn't there something called Xemacs as well?
>
> "Same thing, but different." If memory serves, XEmacs started life
> as a branch from "normal" ("FSF" or "GNU") Emacs over frustration on
> get
"me" == me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
me> Now is this plain eMacs?
me> Isn't there something called Xemacs as well?
Yes, although both are usually capitalized differently: Emacs and XEmacs.
--
---
Eric
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And - as I said - both remove my old address and keep my new (in the
>> CC header). And I have no idea what governs this behaviour.
>
> ,[ (info "(message)Wide Reply") ]
> |Addresses that match the `message-dont-reply-to-names' regular
> | expres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Now is this plain eMacs?
>
> Isn't there something called Xemacs as well?
"Same thing, but different." If memory serves, XEmacs started life as
a branch from "normal" ("FSF" or "GNU") Emacs over frustration on
getting one of the older releases out. It's historically
notbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't use emacs for everything, but it's very good for some things.
> It's a great file manager and editor. I used to prefer jed as my
> editor, but recently discovered emacs highlights .foorc files,
> something jed doesn't. OTOH, I don't like gnus over slr
