Re: change in default Follow up behaviour?

2013-07-01 Thread W. Greenhouse
Hi Sivaram, Sivaram Neelakantan writes: > On this and other newsgroups, I believe a 'F' "follow up", to any > message would only send it to the newsgroup. It's been so long that I > don't notice the headers when I do a follow up but only have I noticed > that it replies to the poster and CCs the

change in default Follow up behaviour?

2013-07-01 Thread Sivaram Neelakantan
On this and other newsgroups, I believe a 'F' "follow up", to any message would only send it to the newsgroup. It's been so long that I don't notice the headers when I do a follow up but only have I noticed that it replies to the poster and CCs the list. Is that how follow ups are supposed to wor

Re: expiring with gnus-parameters

2013-07-01 Thread Sivaram Neelakantan
On Mon, Jul 01 2013,Harry Putnam wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan writes: [snipped 15 lines] > You are in luck Sivaram... I posted my question on the ding list and > got this nifty reply from Eric Abrahamsen > > From gmane.emacs.gnus.general > Message-ID: <87fvvypesr@ericabrahamsen.net> > > H

Re: expiring with gnus-parameters

2013-07-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Sivaram Neelakantan writes: > On Fri, Jun 28 2013,Harry Putnam wrote: > > > [snipped 21 lines] > >> The result I'm after is to have certain groups maintain a specific >> backlog of messages like 90 days worth or whatever, and to >> periodically total-expire them down to the actual 90 day backlog,