Thanks for the response;
Is the IMAP server agentized?
Yes.
But still, large mail directories take 5 to 10 minutes at least.
Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail may
be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).
Actually I have tried this method, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
Hi Ross,
Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail
may be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).
Actually I have tried this method, but offlineimap has, on a couple of
occasions, done weird things to my mail
Tassilo Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hm, after I've written this I tried OfflineIMAP and I really like it.
Till now, it didn't do weird things. ;-)
Well, in general I think it's an excellent program. Perhaps the issue
was with my server, the IMAP version, or various other things. And this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
I would use mairix as another alternative, but I understand there's
been issues between mairix and gnus.
There shouldn't anymore if you use the nnmairix backend:
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs-en/GnusMairix
If you have problems with it, just
Thanks for the tip, David.
I'll check it out.
Cheers.
Ross
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
I would use mairix as another alternative, but I understand there's
been issues between mairix and gnus.
There shouldn't anymore if you use the nnmairix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
Hi Ross,
Often I need to go into an archive directory to find old email or
addresses. In mutt, once the headers are downloaded, subsequent
rescans of the archive are very fast (the archive has about 15,000
messages in it). But gnus seems to want to
