Re: Kernel upgrade request

2013-10-11 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:10:17AM +0800, Mark Wu wrote:
 Dear infra,
 
 We need upgrade kernel to 3.11.3-201.fc19 to make a vdsm network
 functional test passed on F19 test systems. You could refer to
 http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/19974/ for details.

I'm seconding this request, FWIW.
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: frequent gerrit.ovirt.org session expiry

2013-10-11 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:36:13AM +0200, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
 On 10/09/2013 11:20 PM, Yaniv Dary wrote:
 Didn't help.
 Hmm I haven't had to login now for the past two days, which was not
 like this before. For me it improved the experience.
 Thanks for the adjustment.

Works for me as well, even if connected via two devices concurrently.

Thanks.
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: Kernel upgrade request

2013-10-11 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:15:45AM +0100, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:10:17AM +0800, Mark Wu wrote:
  Dear infra,
  
  We need upgrade kernel to 3.11.3-201.fc19 to make a vdsm network
  functional test passed on F19 test systems. You could refer to
  http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/19974/ for details.
 
 I'm seconding this request, FWIW.

At this moment all f19 slaves are already running 3.11.3-201.fc19.x86_64
so I don't know if it was upgraded in the mean time. It could be that
because they were rebooted yesterday to move away from tmpfs on /tmp,
that the new version was booted.
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: Kernel upgrade request

2013-10-11 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Am Freitag, den 11.10.2013, 10:15 +0100 schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
 On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:10:17AM +0800, Mark Wu wrote:
  Dear infra,
  
  We need upgrade kernel to 3.11.3-201.fc19 to make a vdsm network
  functional test passed on F19 test systems. You could refer to
  http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/19974/ for details.
 
 I'm seconding this request, FWIW.

Hey,

I honestly wonder why the functional tests - which seem to have so many
requirements on the OS - are not moved to run inside some short-lived VM
e.g. using Igor.

- fabian

___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Kimchi infrastructure logistics

2013-10-11 Thread Adam Litke
Hi all,

I am very happy that kimchi has been accepted as the newest oVirt
incubator project.  Now, I look forward to working with the
infrastructure team as one of the first steps that kimchi can take to
collaborate.  The services that kimchi currently uses are: GitHub for
SCM and Wiki, Google Groups for a mailing list, and #kimchi on oftc.net
for chat.  Most of these things are working very well but I think the
great oVirt infrastructure can offer us some room for improvement:

 - Kimchi is set to release 1.0 on Monday.  I would love to host some
   pre-built packages (RPM and DEB) for our most common targets (Fedora
   19, Ubuntu 13.04, RHEL-6.4, and openSUSE 12.3).  Could some storage
   space be arranged in your current download area for this purpose?

 - Google Groups is awful as a mailing list.  Our project is
   internationalized and messages encoded in UTF-8 are mangled by
   Google's servers.  I look forward to moving patch discussion onto an
   oVirt list such as kimchi-de...@ovirt.org.

At this time we are very happy to continue code review on the mailing
list so we will not be needing any gerrit services.

Are the above items feasible?  Is there anything I can do to help with
setup?  Thanks for your help and we look forward to doing some cool
things with Kimchi and oVirt.

-- 
Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
IBM Linux Technology Center

___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra