On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:17:35PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
with 3.3.0 coming soon, one of the questions I heard is what about
3.3.1 considering the number of patches fox bugs that went into
master branch since since we branched to stabilize 3.3.0.
i.e., most of the work in master branch has
with 3.3.0 coming soon, one of the questions I heard is what about
3.3.1 considering the number of patches fox bugs that went into master
branch since since we branched to stabilize 3.3.0.
i.e., most of the work in master branch has been focused on bug fixes)
so my suggestion is for 3.3.1 that
On 09/09/2013 04:31 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 09/09/2013 09:28 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 09/09/2013 04:19 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 09/09/2013 08:17 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
with 3.3.0 coming soon, one of the questions I heard is what about
3.3.1 considering the number of patches fox bugs that
On 09/09/2013 09:28 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 09/09/2013 04:19 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 09/09/2013 08:17 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
with 3.3.0 coming soon, one of the questions I heard is what about
3.3.1 considering the number of patches fox bugs that went into master
branch since since we
On 09/09/2013 04:19 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 09/09/2013 08:17 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
with 3.3.0 coming soon, one of the questions I heard is what about
3.3.1 considering the number of patches fox bugs that went into master
branch since since we branched to stabilize 3.3.0.
i.e., most of the
