Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-08-25 Thread Eyal Edri
Yes, Checkout recently patches we used to support it in standard ci for vdsm for e.g: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/61629/ Also, there is a new documentation [1] on how to add JJB files to standard CI. [1] http://infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/CI/Adding_yamlized_jobs_with_JJB.html

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-08-25 Thread Juan Hernández
On 08/25/2016 12:24 PM, Eyal Edri wrote: > Yes, > just use the ppc64le label in jenkins. > We already build vdsm, ioprocess & qemu-kvm. > Can you explain how to use that Jenkins "label"? > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Juan Hernández >

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-08-25 Thread Eyal Edri
Yes, just use the ppc64le label in jenkins. We already build vdsm, ioprocess & qemu-kvm. On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > On 05/31/2016 01:42 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > > On 04/29/2016 01:14 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > >> On 04/29/2016 01:13 PM,

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-08-25 Thread Juan Hernández
On 05/31/2016 01:42 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > On 04/29/2016 01:14 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: >> On 04/29/2016 01:13 PM, David Caro wrote: >>> On 04/29 13:08, Juan Hernández wrote: On 04/29/2016 01:07 PM, David Caro wrote: > On 04/29 10:52, Juan Hernández wrote: >> Hello, >>

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-05-31 Thread Eyal Edri
Still no response from IBM. We are waiting for an IBM field engineer to arrive on site. Evgheni is tracking it as well. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > On 04/29/2016 01:14 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > > On 04/29/2016 01:13 PM, David Caro wrote: > >>

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-05-31 Thread Juan Hernández
On 04/29/2016 01:14 PM, Juan Hernández wrote: > On 04/29/2016 01:13 PM, David Caro wrote: >> On 04/29 13:08, Juan Hernández wrote: >>> On 04/29/2016 01:07 PM, David Caro wrote: On 04/29 10:52, Juan Hernández wrote: > Hello, > > Some of the packages that I maintain have native

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-04-29 Thread Juan Hernández
On 04/29/2016 01:13 PM, David Caro wrote: > On 04/29 13:08, Juan Hernández wrote: >> On 04/29/2016 01:07 PM, David Caro wrote: >>> On 04/29 10:52, Juan Hernández wrote: Hello, Some of the packages that I maintain have native components that depend on the underlying processor

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-04-29 Thread David Caro
On 04/29 13:08, Juan Hernández wrote: > On 04/29/2016 01:07 PM, David Caro wrote: > > On 04/29 10:52, Juan Hernández wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Some of the packages that I maintain have native components that > >> depend on the underlying processor architecture. Currently we are > >> building

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-04-29 Thread Juan Hernández
On 04/29/2016 01:07 PM, David Caro wrote: > On 04/29 10:52, Juan Hernández wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Some of the packages that I maintain have native components that >> depend on the underlying processor architecture. Currently we are >> building these packages only for x86_64. Do we have or can we

Re: Do we have or can have ppc64 and ppc64le slaves in Jenkins?

2016-04-29 Thread David Caro
On 04/29 10:52, Juan Hernández wrote: > Hello, > > Some of the packages that I maintain have native components that depend > on the underlying processor architecture. Currently we are building > these packages only for x86_64. Do we have or can we have ppc64 and > ppc64 le Jenkins slaves in order