Re: dev.fedoraproject.org

2010-07-18 Thread Xavier Lamien
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So it is probably time to have a dev.fedoraproject.org.  Why?  Well, toshio had mentioned having others do some of the 'sysadminy' tasks so developers can focus on development. Also Luke had an analogous request wrt

Re: dev.fedoraproject.org

2010-07-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Xavier Lamien wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So it is probably time to have a dev.fedoraproject.org.  Why?  Well, toshio had mentioned having others do some of the 'sysadminy' tasks so developers can focus on

Re: dev.fedoraproject.org

2010-07-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 22:28, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So it is probably time to have a dev.fedoraproject.org.  Why?  Well, toshio had mentioned having others do some of the 'sysadminy' tasks so developers can focus on development. Also Luke had an analogous request wrt

Re: dev.fedoraproject.org

2010-07-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 22:28, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So it is probably time to have a dev.fedoraproject.org.  Why?  Well, toshio had mentioned having others do some of the 'sysadminy' tasks so developers can focus on

Re: dev.fedoraproject.org

2010-07-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 19:29, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Another example, stuff that we write that's already in our environment would probably all be worked on from the dev servers.  Trac though, probably not since we don't