Thank you for the patch. This needs to be 'fixed' later to use the
wsgi_* variables that other services use.
On 17 March 2017 at 21:13, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I get retroactive +1s for the patch?
> This drops the number of threads and processes down to normal limits:
> having 200
Hi,
Can I get retroactive +1s for the patch?
This drops the number of threads and processes down to normal limits:
having 200 * 20 + 100 * 10 = 5000 threads for wsgi is... not going to
work.
Patrick
commit 66172d7738bbee3749520b025a24b8930e5fd2c0
Author: Patrick Uiterwijk
Date: Sat Mar 18 0
Are the files also moved to the correct template directory or are they
there already? If they are there already +1
On 17 March 2017 at 20:07, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Turns out I'll need a follow-up...
>
> Can I get +!s to also apply the following to make this actually work?
>
> Moved roles/ani
+1 sorry for not noticing that on the first patch. ;(
kevin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le.
+1
On 17 March 2017 at 15:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is a simple little tweak that fixes pagure saying:
>
> "Contact root@localhost" when it emits a 500 error.
>
> This would fix ticket:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5906
>
> +1s?
>
> kevin
> --
> diff --git a/roles/pagure/fr
+1 here
On 17 March 2017 at 19:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1 here. Please do.
>
> kevin
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Turns out I'll need a follow-up...
Can I get +!s to also apply the following to make this actually work?
Moved roles/anitya/frontend/files/0_releasemonitoring.conf ->
roles/anitya/frontend/templates/0_releasemonitoring.conf
Moved roles/piwik/files/piwik-httpd.conf ->
roles/piwik/templates/piwik-h
+1 here. Please do.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Turns out that these three services were not yet using our global
> secure cipher set.
> This means that they have the Apache defaults, which are quite
> insecure (RC4 and no FS).
> Can I please get +1s to apply the underneath pa
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:56:50PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> This is a simple little tweak that fixes pagure saying:
>>
>> "Contact root@localhost" when it emits a 500 error.
>>
>> This would fix ticket:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-in
Hi,
Turns out that these three services were not yet using our global
secure cipher set.
This means that they have the Apache defaults, which are quite
insecure (RC4 and no FS).
Can I please get +1s to apply the underneath patch?
Patrick
commit 55183057fc95109df5d6b50258918c59c7930674
Author: P
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:56:50PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is a simple little tweak that fixes pagure saying:
>
> "Contact root@localhost" when it emits a 500 error.
>
> This would fix ticket:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5906
>
> +1s?
Cool +1 for me :)
Pierre
>
This is a simple little tweak that fixes pagure saying:
"Contact root@localhost" when it emits a 500 error.
This would fix ticket:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5906
+1s?
kevin
--
diff --git a/roles/pagure/frontend/templates/0_pagure.conf
b/roles/pagure/frontend/templates/0_pa
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:36:37PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Thanks for the details...
>
> I am still +1 to updating this, as I think it's better that we have the
> known/current version in use rather than some "might be hotfixed"
> version.
Same here, even if that makes rolling back harder (
On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 04:56 -0600, InvalidPath wrote:
> I'm going to attempt to write this, Im looking for any info anyone
> currently has:
>
> hosting nodes?
> backend db?
> application names?
>
> Anything at all would be appreciated.
This is a script that runs on sundries01 (and sundries01.stg
On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 09:47 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I am in process in writing playbook for retrace.fedoraproject.org
>
> ABRT team created:
> https://github.com/abrt/ansible-role-retrace-server
>
> Which we can use. I just wonder what is best practise for using such 3rd
> party rol
Thanks for the details...
I am still +1 to updating this, as I think it's better that we have the
known/current version in use rather than some "might be hotfixed"
version.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
I just remembered that I had never upgraded production to version
2017.0:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-atomic-composer/releases/tag/2017.0
This means that if I install 2017.1 (which has the 1-char diff I asked
for an FBR on) it will also be installing those changes.
FWIW, most of those
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:26:47AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> Production resultsdb_frontend is also really slow and I'd like to
> bump it's resources at the same time I bump resultsdb from the
> other FBR.
>
> +1s?
+1
Pierre
>
> From 9757a01edfe14a2455f523d0ac7cb8cfb4e92f8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
+1
kevin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+1
kevin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Production resultsdb_frontend is also really slow and I'd like to
bump it's resources at the same time I bump resultsdb from the
other FBR.
+1s?
Tim
From 9757a01edfe14a2455f523d0ac7cb8cfb4e92f8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Flink
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:23:12 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/2]
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 09:41:02AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> Production resultsdb is still really slow and we're still seeing the
> occasional error on result posting so I'd like to bump the resources
> allocated to the wsgi app again.
I wonder if this doesn't saturate the server at one point
I'm
Production resultsdb is still really slow and we're still seeing the
occasional error on result posting so I'd like to bump the resources
allocated to the wsgi app again.
+1s?
Tim
From 3d45155959cbdcde39c1a98a584a100b590761db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Flink
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:33
Hi Ben,
I've found the Fedora link below in one of my searches:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Revie
w_Process
Cheers,
Aurelie
On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 04:56 -0600, InvalidPath wrote:
> I'm going to attempt to write this, Im looking for any info anyone
> current
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:37:19AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:37:07 +0100
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:44:37PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > This has been pending for a long time and now that the bureaucratic
> > > stuff has been figured out a
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:37:07 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:44:37PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > This has been pending for a long time and now that the bureaucratic
> > stuff has been figured out and our dev/stg instances are running
> > well, we'd like to enable pack
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:28:31 +
Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So, our noc02 monitoring of Koji build targets broke because the
> modularity stuff pushed rawhide to the second page :).
> Can I get +1s to start testing for "infra" instead, which should match
> $release-infra and such?
+1
kevin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:28:31PM +, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So, our noc02 monitoring of Koji build targets broke because the
> modularity stuff pushed rawhide to the second page :).
> Can I get +1s to start testing for "infra" instead, which should match
> $release-infra and s
This was being worked on and fixed with Patrick at 0800 UTC
On 17 March 2017 at 03:09, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> Team,
>
> The community has been experiencing issues with the FPO infrastructure
> intermittently. I believe I've found the destination causing the issue:
>
> $ curl -vso /dev/null --
Hi all,
So, our noc02 monitoring of Koji build targets broke because the
modularity stuff pushed rawhide to the second page :).
Can I get +1s to start testing for "infra" instead, which should match
$release-infra and such?
Patrick
commit dd4583fff2ca0739dee955197be02551373a23f5
Author: Patrick
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Last night, we've found that proxy14 was not up "up" the last few days
> (since it was rebooted for the RDU migration).
> Can I get +1s to get it added to noc02?
> Patch after the break.
+1
> Patrick
>
>
> commit 0e69fbf106b
I'm going to attempt to write this, Im looking for any info anyone
currently has:
hosting nodes?
backend db?
application names?
Anything at all would be appreciated.
Ben
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:54:16AM +, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Last night, we've found that proxy14 was not up "up" the last few days
> (since it was rebooted for the RDU migration).
> Can I get +1s to get it added to noc02?
> Patch after the break.
+1 for me,
Pierre
> commit
Hi all,
Last night, we've found that proxy14 was not up "up" the last few days
(since it was rebooted for the RDU migration).
Can I get +1s to get it added to noc02?
Patch after the break.
Patrick
commit 0e69fbf106b7e5ce361f561de028e8e716825a32
Author: Patrick Uiterwijk
Date: Fri Mar 17 08:4
Hi,
I am in process in writing playbook for retrace.fedoraproject.org
ABRT team created:
https://github.com/abrt/ansible-role-retrace-server
Which we can use. I just wonder what is best practise for using such 3rd party
roles?
Should I just copy it into our ansible.git? Or should I use ansible-g
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:52:43PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> This is less important than the other FBR that I submitted but I'd like
> to do it while things are paused for the other change.
>
> I'd like to enable nested virt on the virthosts that run the Taskotron
> production clients. What I'd be
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:44:37PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> This has been pending for a long time and now that the bureaucratic
> stuff has been figured out and our dev/stg instances are running well,
> we'd like to enable package-specific tasks in Taskotron production.
>
> This will involve:
>
Team,
The community has been experiencing issues with the FPO infrastructure
intermittently. I believe I've found the destination causing the issue:
$ curl -vso /dev/null --resolve fedoraproject.org:443:8.43.85.67
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki
* Added fedoraproject.org:443:8
40 matches
Mail list logo
