On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 08:25:48AM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote:
>
> This is my top pick!
The one reason why I don't like this choice is that pagure.io was
supposed to be distribution agnostic. Just an open source forge.
Thats why you see 'fedora-infrastructure' and 'fedora-kickstarts' and
such as
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 6:26 PM Ryan Lerch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 07:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Hey folks.
>>
>> So, a few weeks back I noticed some spam projects on pagure.io.
>> So, I cleaned up about 165 of them and deactivated 165 spam users.
>>
>> Now, I see there's another
On 25-04-2023 23:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, thoughts on a longer term solution? I can think of a few:
1. only allow fedora 'contributors' to make new projects. (ie, people in
at least one non cla/non base ipa group
Pros:
- Would very likely cut off the spam or at least cut it way down.
- Might
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 07:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> So, a few weeks back I noticed some spam projects on pagure.io.
> So, I cleaned up about 165 of them and deactivated 165 spam users.
>
> Now, I see there's another pile of them. :(
>
> So, I started to look at cleaning things up
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote:
> Regarding the #3, how do you find spam projects now? Could the script do the
> same?
I find them manually. Go to pagure.io, browse projects and sort by 'most
recent'. About 99% of the first 4-5 pages are clearly spam. They are
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Has anyone use awscli2? How did you configure it to use Fedora SSO?
>
> I played with it, but with not luck.
>
> BTW awcli2 is now in package review process and is available at
>
>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 02:37:57PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24. 04. 23 v 18:51 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > Did you only look at us-east-1? There might be more in other regions?
> > (although less I suspect).
>
> Yeah, we have lots of volumes in Ohio. Yes, I am checking other regions.
Hi -
> > > 1. only allow fedora 'contributors' to make new projects. (ie, people in
> > > at least one non cla/non base ipa group
> > > [...]
> > > Cons:
> > > - Would block legit people who aren't fedora contributors.
The other positive edge of that sword could be giving them an
incentive to
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:17:34PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> So, a few weeks back I noticed some spam projects on pagure.io.
> So, I cleaned up about 165 of them and deactivated 165 spam users.
I took out a few a week or so ago, but not as many, I'm impressed :)
> Now, I see
Here is my thoughts on this :
Implement community moderation: Allow the community of users on pagure.io
to help moderate and flag spam projects and users. This could be done
through a reporting system or through user-driven flagging mechanisms that
alert administrators to potentially problematic
Has anyone use awscli2? How did you configure it to use Fedora SSO?
I played with it, but with not luck.
BTW awcli2 is now in package review process and is available at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/build/5851296/
Miroslav
Dne 24. 04. 23 v 18:51 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Did you only look at us-east-1? There might be more in other regions?
(although less I suspect).
Yeah, we have lots of volumes in Ohio. Yes, I am checking other regions.
FYI I started manually with the biggest volumes. And I pause between them.
I'm not against moving our mailing list to discourse, life is a change.
I just need to adjust my workflow to this :-)
Michal
On 25. 04. 23 23:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
As some of you who follow the devel list may know, Matthew put forward
the idea of starting to move some discussion over to
Regarding the #3, how do you find spam projects now? Could the script do
the same?
Michal
On 25. 04. 23 23:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Hey folks.
So, a few weeks back I noticed some spam projects on pagure.io.
So, I cleaned up about 165 of them and deactivated 165 spam users.
Now, I see there's
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 22:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Should we look at moving to discussion.fedoraproject.org instead of this
> list?
Yes.
> We have a tag there already.
Perfect.
> Thoughts?
The KISS principle always works. Plain text only approach used to be
simple, but this is no longer
15 matches
Mail list logo
