Hello folks!
I would like to submit a Freeze Break Request to add redirects[1] from
getfedora.org to the new website[2] on fedoraproject.org.
This will need to be applied during F38 launch on Tuesday.
Can I get some +1s?
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1372
[2]:
+1 from me
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:09 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1232
>
> --
> Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
> Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
> -- Ian MacClaren
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1232
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
infrastructure mailing list --
+1 from me. Thanks smooge
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:10 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:27:16AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
> > take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:27:16AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
> take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
> was in this state:
> ```
> disable proxy09.fedoraproject.org
> disable
Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
was in this state:
```
disable proxy09.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
disable
+1
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:28 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:11 PM Nick Bebout wrote:
> >
> > I was working on a ticket mattdm filed about some spammers in Pagure.
> I'd like to add myself to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS and run the Pagure playbook.
> >
> > PR here:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:11 PM Nick Bebout wrote:
>
> I was working on a ticket mattdm filed about some spammers in Pagure. I'd
> like to add myself to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS and run the Pagure playbook.
>
> PR here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1048
>
+1 here
--
I was working on a ticket mattdm filed about some spammers in Pagure. I'd
like to add myself to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS and run the Pagure playbook.
PR here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1048
nb
___
infrastructure mailing list --
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 03:53:54PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The certs for our openshift 3 clusters in both stg and prod are out of
> date. I have created new ones and I have a PR here to update the name in
> ansible:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1045#
>
Hi All,
The certs for our openshift 3 clusters in both stg and prod are out of
date. I have created new ones and I have a PR here to update the name in
ansible:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1045#
I will need to run the proxies playbook to deploy these as well.
I have
This had the required +1's so I merged and ran it
Mark
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 1:57 AM Nick Bebout wrote:
> My mirror at USI will be becoming public and it's IP is changing. I'd
> like to add the new IP and run the playbook.
>
> Can I get +1's for
>
My mirror at USI will be becoming public and it's IP is changing. I'd like
to add the new IP and run the playbook.
Can I get +1's for https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1017
please?
nb
___
infrastructure mailing list --
Thanks all! Merged and run
On Tue 22 Mar 2022, 15:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon, wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:34:57PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update
> their
> > IP address:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:34:57PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update their
> IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598
>
> This PR should take care of it
>
+1 this is needed for release as kernel.org is a major offloader.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 10:35, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update
> their IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598
>
> This PR should take
Hi All,
We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update their
IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598
This PR should take care of it
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1010
I would also need to run the download playbook to apply the
Hi everyone.
My name is Alejandro Senges aka Alex, I'm from Venezuela, actually living
in Montevideo Uruguay. I am studying low level c programming and have some
experience with python.
I would like to start participating in some coding tasks as an apprentice
here.
Is that possible?
On Fri,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 04:31:31PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
> realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.
>
> OCP worker node worker06.ocp.iad2.fedoraproject.org had its installed
>
Thanks for the notification. +1 for the change (post)
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 11:32, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
> realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.
>
> OCP worker node
Hi All,
I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.
OCP worker node worker06.ocp.iad2.fedoraproject.org had its installed
software raid removed. This node was then added to OCP as a local volume to
+1 to this
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 16:27, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to a bug in initial-setup [0] we need to update oz to 0.18.1-2 on
> some aarch64 builders. The list is obtained by running
>
> $ koji list-hosts --enabled --arch armhfp --channel image --arch aarch64
>
> Hosts:
>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 04:26:27PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to a bug in initial-setup [0] we need to update oz to 0.18.1-2 on
> some aarch64 builders. The list is obtained by running
>
> $ koji list-hosts --enabled --arch armhfp --channel image --arch aarch64
>
> Hosts:
>
Hello,
Due to a bug in initial-setup [0] we need to update oz to 0.18.1-2 on
some aarch64 builders. The list is obtained by running
$ koji list-hosts --enabled --arch armhfp --channel image --arch aarch64
Hosts:
buildhw-a64-01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-02.iad2.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:04:52PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
> changelog:
> - Warn users when a PR contains some characters
> - srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:07:26AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:06 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
> > changelog:
> > - Warn users when a PR contains some
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:06 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
> changelog:
> - Warn users when a PR contains some characters
> - srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website
Good Morning Everyone,
This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
changelog:
- Warn users when a PR contains some characters
- srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website (Brendan Early)
- srcfpo theme: left-align the lines in description
Merging and deploying.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 16:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> +1 here.
>
> kevin
> --
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:12:44PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: (Cron
+1 here.
kevin
--
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:12:44PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: (Cron Daemon)
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
> Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
>
+1 looks good to me
On Mon 18 Oct 2021, 20:15 Stephen John Smoogen, wrote:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: (Cron Daemon)
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
> Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
-- Forwarded message -
From: (Cron Daemon)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
sync-up-downloads "/usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos"
To:
/usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper: line 50:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:09:09PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would like to create a maintainer test instance in AWS. Below I
> > have a dns patch and an ansible PR for your consideration.
> >
> > This will also require a
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:09:09PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to create a maintainer test instance in AWS. Below I
> have a dns patch and an ansible PR for your consideration.
>
> This will also require a playbook run on the batcave for the vpn
> settings
>
> As
Hi All,
I would like to create a maintainer test instance in AWS. Below I
have a dns patch and an ansible PR for your consideration.
This will also require a playbook run on the batcave for the vpn
settings
As always all input is greatly appreciated.
DNS:
Hi,
Since F35 beta is go now, we can enable bodhi for automated pushes and
set the 35 bodhi status to post beta.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/814
+1's please,
Thanks.
___
infrastructure mailing list --
Hi,
The PR [0] will enable automated signing for f36-openh264 tag which is
needed to update the openh264 repos for rawhide/f36 and also fix
issues in f35. Currently the pungi compose is failing due to missing
signed rpms, this will fix that issue.
+1's please
Thanks.
Thanks for the +1s I have run the playbook
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:32 PM Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:10 PM Mark O'Brien wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
> > playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
> >
+1
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:10 PM Mark O'Brien wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
> playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
> sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
> as requested in this ticket:
>
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 03:08:12PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
> playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
> sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
> as requested in this ticket:
>
>
Hi All,
I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
as requested in this ticket:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10231
As always comments/+1's welcome
Thanks,
Mark
> All corresponding projects have been update to handle empty topdirs.
>
> To apply https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/775 for
> prod I need this FBR.
>
> There are risks doing code changes like this during a freeze. So far I
> have not seen any problems in
a slash all over the place.
>
> All corresponding projects have been update to handle empty topdirs.
>
> To apply https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/775 for
> prod I need this FBR.
Also this may need a bit more work on proxies.
Something like:
diff --git a/playb
this FBR.
There are risks doing code changes like this during a freeze. So far I
have not seen any problems in staging, but staging is not using using
MirrorManager as thoroughly as prod. I don't expect any major problems
with this change.
I hope someone from the CentOS team can weigh if this is very
PR has been merged and playbook run.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:06 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 14:40, kevin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 14:40, kevin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our robosignatory
> > installation in CentOS Stream:
> >
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our robosignatory
> installation in CentOS Stream:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/772
>
> I hope this turns out to be low impact, and
Hi Folks,
We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our robosignatory
installation in CentOS Stream:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/772
I hope this turns out to be low impact, and Mark was also looking at generating
certificates for this.
+1s from sysadmins
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:47:43PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Freeze break request for review. I would like to add a host group
> for the openshift hosts in ipa so that we can give access to the
> sysadmin-openshift team.
>
>
Hi All,
I have a Freeze break request for review. I would like to add a host group
for the openshift hosts in ipa so that we can give access to the
sysadmin-openshift team.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/768#
Any +1's from sysadmin-main/releng greatly appreciated
p.s. if
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:13:25PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10186
>
> Could I get some reviews/+1's on this PR. It will allow for the work to
> continue
> on the deployment of the openshift 4 cluster for Fedora.
>
>
Hi All,
As per https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10186
Could I get some reviews/+1's on this PR. It will allow for the work to
continue
on the deployment of the openshift 4 cluster for Fedora.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/761
Thanks all,
Mark
tively rather than waiting for the FBR approval to get the RC
> going.
Yeah, retroactive +1 we want this to match.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
Hi,
I am updating pungi on compose-x86-01.iad2.fp.o to
pungi-4.2.8-1.fc33.infra.1.noarch to match it with the one installed
on compose-branched01.iad2.fp.o for running beta RC's. I am doing this
proactively rather than waiting for the FBR approval to get the RC
going.
Thanks,
Mohan Boddu
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i3 spin is a new deliverable for F34 and this PR [1] adds the needed
> config for generating the i3 live iso as part of nightly compose.
>
> Please give your +1's.
>
> [1] https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1012
+1
Hi,
i3 spin is a new deliverable for F34 and this PR [1] adds the needed
config for generating the i3 live iso as part of nightly compose.
Please give your +1's.
[1] https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1012
Thanks,
Mohan Boddu.
___
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:56:11AM +0100, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
> to the Fedora 33 key?
> (Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
> with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically
> Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
> to the Fedora 33 key?
> (Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
> with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically cleans up.)
+1 from me
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> commit
Hi,
Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
to the Fedora 33 key?
(Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically cleans up.)
Thanks,
Patrick
commit 3ee8dd3f9e883414c7846d115d2926f73ec9ea99
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 09:49:03 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:43:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1, but it would sure be nice to test in staging first. ;)
>
> Got staging to work
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:43:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > I have just tagged and release the version 0.09 of the mediawiki-skin-fedora
> > package.
> > It contains two changes:
> > - a fix
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I have just tagged and release the version 0.09 of the mediawiki-skin-fedora
> package.
> It contains two changes:
> - a fix to the CoC link in the footer
> - adding the last edit date near the top of
Good Morning Everyone,
I have just tagged and release the version 0.09 of the mediawiki-skin-fedora
package.
It contains two changes:
- a fix to the CoC link in the footer
- adding the last edit date near the top of the pages
(fixes https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8636 )
The
This has now been merged
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:13 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
> +1 after review.
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 09:22, Mark O'Brien wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
>> Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and
+1 after review.
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 09:22, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
> Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
> checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:22:21PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
> Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
> checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic toward the
Hi All,
Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic toward the
servers
Just a note, the do-domains script would also need to be run on
+1 lgtm
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:45 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > > Need
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > Need to fix opendkim on bastion
> > >
> > > I merged a fix in
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Need to fix opendkim on bastion
> >
> > I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
> > have not run the playbook for bastion to push
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Need to fix opendkim on bastion
>
> I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
> have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would like to
> get a +1 or -1 on this before doing
Need to fix opendkim on bastion
I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would like to
get a +1 or -1 on this before doing that. [I can remove the merge also if
that is better.]
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
This has been done.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 16:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
> > guest in ansible and via virsh commands.
>
> +1. we have tons of free
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
> guest in ansible and via virsh commands.
+1. we have tons of free memory there, should use it.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:52 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each guest
> in ansible and via virsh commands.
>
+1
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 15:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
> guest in ansible and via virsh commands.
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>
diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/koji b/inventory/group_vars/koji
index
Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
guest in ansible and via virsh commands.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:03:24PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
> --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:03 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
> --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:03 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
> --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
>
diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
--- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
+++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
*@fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
+1 here from the updated diff
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 20:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Reviewed updated diff. +1
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 12:41, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400,
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 00:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
> hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
> stuck hardware.
>
> I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
>
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 17:43, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
> out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
> this out further per continental region.
>
> diff --git
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:33:45AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are
> timing
> > out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to
> break
> > this out
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:33:45AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
> out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
> this out further per continental region.
Is there somewhere you are
Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
this out further per continental region.
diff --git a/roles/dns/files/named.conf b/roles/dns/files/named.conf
index c8b95b9..135ec69 100644
---
+!
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 18:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
> hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
> stuck hardware.
>
> I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
>
Server has some problems with services and guests. We would like to reboot
the system to clear some issues being seen.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
stuck hardware.
I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
like to update and reboot ppc9-02. Due to existing builds this
Reviewed updated diff. +1
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 12:41, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> 2 things:
>
> I do not think we want to change
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
>
> Thanks.
2 things:
I do not think we want to change pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
today. If we do, gnome-software will start offering f32
Hi,
The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
Thanks.
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
index 97afa7c..c8fdc31 100644
--- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
+++
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 04:24:05PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
Looks fine to me.
Do note that staging isn't frozen ever, so we can just apply this and do
whats needed to make it live (run greenwave playbook, starting new
greenwave image build, deploy new pods).
kevin
signature.asc
LGTM +1
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
From 6c9da110bdb380beb0192d4188725e91d2dc3549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:23:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] STAGING: Support Fedora ELN for Greenwave
Signed-off-by: Stephen Gallagher
---
roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/fedora.yaml | 12
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:35:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve
1 - 100 of 1307 matches
Mail list logo
