On 7/12/23 19:03, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 13. 07. 23 v 0:26 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
>> If you say it's an issue then hopefully we can give this some priority and
>> get to it soon.
>>
>> Removing the "old ones" isn't that easy to do. Our production AMIs and
>> development AMIs are all mixed
Dne 13. 07. 23 v 0:26 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
If you say it's an issue then hopefully we can give this some priority and get
to it soon.
Removing the "old ones" isn't that easy to do. Our production AMIs and
development AMIs are all mixed together so it would be hard to come up with a criteria
On 7/12/23 16:17, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 11. 07. 23 v 15:53 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
>> Apologies for not responding sooner. Actually for some reason this is the
>> first email I've seen
>> in the thread so maybe I need to check my spam filters. Either way,
>> apologies.
>>
>> The reason you
Dne 11. 07. 23 v 15:53 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
Apologies for not responding sooner. Actually for some reason this is the first
email I've seen
in the thread so maybe I need to check my spam filters. Either way, apologies.
The reason you are seeing snapshots but no volumes is because these
On 7/11/23 04:21, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 05. 07. 23 v 21:17 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2023 06:39, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I was going through our spending in AWS and I found that we spent a lot
in Sydney
Dne 05. 07. 23 v 21:17 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 03/07/2023 06:39, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I was going through our spending in AWS and I found that we spent a lot
in Sydney region (?). In details most of the bill there is because of
I was going through our spending in AWS and I found that we spent a lot in Sydney region (?). In details most of the
bill there is because of stored snapshots. There is 7508 of them dated to back to 2013. For volumes that does not exists
any more.
The only instances (and volumes) we have in
