Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-19 Thread Ben Cotton
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > we can keep doing the wikiedit requests that are just wiki and point > people who want to contribute more (Or don't know where they want to > contibute) to join sig. :) > As the person who argued in favor of keeping wikiedit, I'm happy to own

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-18 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 08:21:51 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > ok, that was not clear to me at least... if you want us to keep > processing wikiedit requests we can do that, but then that doesn't > really change much for us? No, it doesn't (please see the end of this e-mail[1]). The idea was to

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-18 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 08:21:57 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Then there has been a lot of confusion because we also don't really > have the resources to administer wikiedit and thought this was what > this group was to help us with. The Join SIG's plan was to remove the wikiedit group

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 08:21:57AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 05:08, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I think we've managed to create a bit of confusion here, so I thought > > I'd clarify it. > > > > For cases where an individual requests wikiedit access

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 05:08, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > I think we've managed to create a bit of confusion here, so I thought > I'd clarify it. > > For cases where an individual requests wikiedit access only to edit the > wiki (as in the recent case of @abolgna[1]), will infra please

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-18 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, I think we've managed to create a bit of confusion here, so I thought I'd clarify it. For cases where an individual requests wikiedit access only to edit the wiki (as in the recent case of @abolgna[1]), will infra please continue to give them the necessary access as before? Fedora-join

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:16:17PM +0100, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > Out of curiosity, here's some data about wikiedit FAS group. snip > > Disclaimer: I'm not a data scientist :-) > The tool used to get such data can be found here: > https://pagure.io/wikieditstats Cool. Some

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-04 Thread alciregi
Out of curiosity, here's some data about wikiedit FAS group. 118 members 4 administrators 4 sponsors 83 members aren't members of any other FAS group 11 are members of 1 additional FAS group 24 are members of more than 1 additional FAS group 74 members last_seen FAS value is dated 2019 44

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 11:04, wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 16:36 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > There are 233 people in the group > > Are you sure? > I can count 118. > Maybe it is due to some privacy setting? > I must have double counted. -- Stephen J Smoogen.

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-04 Thread alciregi
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 16:36 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > There are 233 people in the group Are you sure? I can count 118. Maybe it is due to some privacy setting? Thanks. Ciao, A. ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-01 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 08:28:12 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:38 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > > concerned. > > > > The Fedora Join process should help reduce the number of wikiedit > > membership requests, but

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-30 Thread Ben Cotton
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:38 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > concerned. > > The Fedora Join process should help reduce the number of wikiedit > membership requests, but please feel free to direct folks to us directly > also. > Thank you.

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:16, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 14:51:04 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > > > valid. > > > > > > Sure, so we leave things as

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 14:51:04 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > > valid. > > > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > > concerned. > > > > The Fedora

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > valid. > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > concerned. > > The Fedora Join process should help reduce the number of wikiedit > membership requests, but

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 10:42:49 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:42 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Is only editing the wiki a role nowadays? > > Potentially. > > > There is no community group > > around wiki-editing, no team, no SIG. > > So? So who provides resources to

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 14:39:20 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > I am not sure we can retire the existing group unless we contact all of > > the members and ask them to go through the new process thought right? Yes. We'd have to send out an

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-28 Thread Ben Cotton
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I am not sure we can retire the existing group unless we contact all of > the members and ask them to go through the new process thought right? > > That may be more trouble than it's worth. > Thanks for bringing this up. Retiring the wikiedit

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:07AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 08:43, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Any comments/concerns around this? Otherwise we'll start working on the > > required changes: > > > > - update wiki page(s) to remove mention of the wikiedit system > >

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 08:43, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 00:16:13 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello! > > > > As you can read here[0], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a new way > > to help people become part of the community. > > > > This workflow

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-28 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 00:16:13 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello! > > As you can read here[0], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a new way > to help people become part of the community. > > This workflow includes also a temporary FAS group if required or asked > by the

Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-21 Thread alciregi
Hello! As you can read here[0], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a new way to help people become part of the community. This workflow includes also a temporary FAS group if required or asked by the newcomer. Since this overlaps with the current "wikiedit" system, we were wondering if it'd