Re: status.fp.org concept

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 02:09:48PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 19. 05. 21 v 20:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > You mean the link to nagios? Or ? > > Yes. The link to older outages is not needed with new design. > > > I'm a bit worried linking to nagios there will confuse people... > > Why?

Re: status.fp.org concept

Dne 19. 05. 21 v 20:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): You mean the link to nagios? Or ? Yes. The link to older outages is not needed with new design. I'm a bit worried linking to nagios there will confuse people... Why? When something does not work (for me) then I go to status.f.o, then to

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:25:49PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 19. 05. 21 v 10:05 Ryan Lerch napsal(a): > > What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was > > re-implementing status > > > > https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/ > >

Re: status.fp.org concept

Dne 19. 05. 21 v 10:05 Ryan Lerch napsal(a): What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was re-implementing status https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/ Oh, it already disappeared during datacenter migration. This:

Re: status.fp.org concept

What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was re-implementing status https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/ cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:16 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:18 Stephen John Smoogen

Re: status.fp.org concept

Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:18 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): The reason we are changing is because of that list. Too many people expect us to know instantly that something is broken, something like https://uptimerobot.com/ that rocky linux uses. They also expect us to be

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I like it. Nevertheless, I'll be missing the current page, which lists the > various services Fedora provides. Except it's a incomplete subset of things that people have asked us to add over time. :) So, it's not the full list of

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 10:53, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I like it. Nevertheless, I'll be missing the current page, which lists the > various services Fedora provides. > > > The reason we are changing is because of that list. Too many people expect us to know instantly that something is broken,

Re: status.fp.org concept

I like it. Nevertheless, I'll be missing the current page, which lists the various services Fedora provides. Vít Dne 30. 04. 21 v 14:23 Ryan Lerch napsal(a): Hi all, I have been working on this ticket for an updated version of status.fedoraproject.org .

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 01:36, Ben Cotton wrote: > I like it overall. I'm a little concerned about the backend. Would it > work better to have "outageStarts" and "outageEnds" timestamps in the > file for each outage so that the person handling it doesn't have to > both with moving the files into

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:23:50PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been working on this ticket for an updated version of > status.fedoraproject.org. > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9858 > > I have come up with a proof of concept that fills all the requirements >

Re: status.fp.org concept

I like it overall. I'm a little concerned about the backend. Would it work better to have "outageStarts" and "outageEnds" timestamps in the file for each outage so that the person handling it doesn't have to both with moving the files into the right directory? Or maybe just use labels instead (I'm

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:23:50PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > The source of the POC is here: > https://github.com/ryanlerch/status-playground/ I love your examples. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: status.fp.org concept

That looks awesome! Great work! Le ven. 30 avr. 2021 à 14:24, Ryan Lerch a écrit : > Hi all, > > I have been working on this ticket for an updated version of > status.fedoraproject.org. > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9858 > > I have come up with a proof of concept that fills

status.fp.org concept

Hi all, I have been working on this ticket for an updated version of status.fedoraproject.org. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9858 I have come up with a proof of concept that fills all the requirements specified in the the ticket, and looking for feedback / thoughts on this new