Re: FBR: Configure Bodhi to know how to find alternate arch syncs

On 07/07/2017 04:22 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Thanks for the +1's. This change is now in place on bodhi-backend01, > but fedmsg-hub has not been restarted. There are mash lock files so the > playbook didn't do that part. > > Whenever releng is sure that a mash isn't running, they can systemctl >

Re: FBR: Configure Bodhi to know how to find alternate arch syncs

Thanks for the +1's. This change is now in place on bodhi-backend01, but fedmsg-hub has not been restarted. There are mash lock files so the playbook didn't do that part. Whenever releng is sure that a mash isn't running, they can systemctl restart fedmsg-hub on bodhi-backend01 and the changes

FBR: run commands to enable f25->f26 ostree static delta creation

For https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/291 we'd like to create a static delta from the last fedora 25 commit to the fedora 26 commits we are releasing. Since we don't yet have a unified repo structure we need to pull the last fedora 25 commit into the fedora 26 repo. Can someone with appropriate

Re: FBR: Configure Bodhi to know how to find alternate arch syncs

+1 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: backup policy for ostree repos

On 07/07/2017 05:12 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > As part of some ongoing work we are doing [1] to unify ostree repos > I'd like to inquire about backup policy and data recovery for the storage > that holds ostree repos within Fedora infra. The following directory is > the subject: > >

backup policy for ostree repos

As part of some ongoing work we are doing [1] to unify ostree repos I'd like to inquire about backup policy and data recovery for the storage that holds ostree repos within Fedora infra. The following directory is the subject: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/atomic/ Can someone tell me what

Re: FBR: Configure Bodhi to know how to find alternate arch syncs

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

FBR: Configure Bodhi to know how to find alternate arch syncs

The attached patch for Bodhi's production.ini file will configure it to know about Fedora 26's alternative arches, and how to tell if they have been synchronized with the mirror yet.diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 index

Re: Freeze break: fix bodhi to poll armhfp instead of aarch64

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Currently bodhi polls the master mirror when it's at the end of a push to > confirm updates have landed there. Unfortunately it checks the first arch in > the list, and currently thats aarch64, but the aarc64

Re: [PATCH] Removing branched composes

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > As per Kevin's comment, just commenting the lines. > And, here's the new diff: +1 Patrick ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] Removing branched composes

On 07/07/2017 12:50 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > As per Kevin's comment, just commenting the lines. > And, here's the new diff: +1 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: [PATCH] Removing branched composes

As per Kevin's comment, just commenting the lines. And, here's the new diff: diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched index 26fee6c..64192dd 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/branched +++ b/roles/releng/files/branched @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ # branched compose

Re: Freeze break: fix bodhi to poll armhfp instead of aarch64

Since its going to only check the first arch +1 from me. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Freeze break: fix bodhi to poll armhfp instead of aarch64

Greetings. Currently bodhi polls the master mirror when it's at the end of a push to confirm updates have landed there. Unfortunately it checks the first arch in the list, and currently thats aarch64, but the aarc64 updates are under fedora-secondary so it doesn't ever find them. This

Re: [PATCH] Removing branched composes

On 07/07/2017 11:38 AM, mbo...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Mohan Boddu > > Signed-off-by: Mohan Boddu > --- > roles/releng/files/branched | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched >

[PATCH] Removing branched composes

From: Mohan Boddu Signed-off-by: Mohan Boddu --- roles/releng/files/branched | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched index 26fee6c..0cebe18 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/branched +++

Re: [PATCH] F26 final 0-day release actions

El vie, 07-07-2017 a las 14:36 +, Ralph Bean escribió: > LGTM. +1 here signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [PATCH] F26 final 0-day release actions

LGTM. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[PATCH] F26 final 0-day release actions

From: Mohan Boddu Signed-off-by: Mohan Boddu --- roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2

Re: July status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

0. marc84 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. Yes 5. No 6. Time 7. Yes 8. Yes 9. Swimming On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the

Re: July status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 08:54 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' > group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure > list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for

Re: July status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

Hello all, On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the infrastructure > list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the