Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

Hello all, Apologies for the late response. On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the infrastructure > list). > > Feel free to reply

Re: FBR: Only sync drpms if repo has them

+1 makes sense. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Only sync drpms if repo has them

On 11/10/2017 07:42 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Source repos do not have drpms, and neither do new repos (aka, first > time a release gets mashed). > +1s? > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > index a241eeb..7f3baae

FBR: Only sync drpms if repo has them

Source repos do not have drpms, and neither do new repos (aka, first time a release gets mashed). +1s? diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync index a241eeb..7f3baae 100755 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync +++

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

+1 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [PATCH] add syncing for f27-updates

+1 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

On 11/10/2017 06:19 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Okay, and I need to really start taking note of my jinja tags. > For the record: jinja tags with {{ }}/{% %} are processed by Ansible, > whereas [[ ]]//[% %] are processed by Bodhi. > > This patch should have the correct tags and the correct

Re: [PATCH] add syncing for f27-updates

> --- > roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync | 11 ++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > index a241eeb..35c9d58 100755 > ---

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

Okay, and I need to really start taking note of my jinja tags. For the record: jinja tags with {{ }}/{% %} are processed by Ansible, whereas [[ ]]//[% %] are processed by Bodhi. This patch should have the correct tags and the correct code. diff --git

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

Why must you point out my failures? :) diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 1c6dc02..00b946a 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 @@

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

On 11/10/2017 05:18 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > We can now do multi-arch ostrees for updates! \o/ > Can I get +1s to apply this patch to enable that for Fedora 27 and up? > > Thanks, > Patrick > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 >

Re: [PATCH] sync script: copy history of ostree ref

Oh I see +1 On 10 November 2017 at 17:28, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >> If we happen to miss a sync for whatever reason there could be >> gaps in the ostree history. Adding --depth=-1 will make sure that >> the entire history for the ref is in the target repo.

Re: FBR: sync script: copy history of ostree ref

Is something missing from this email? On 10 November 2017 at 17:26, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > sync script: copy history of ostree ref > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send

Re: [PATCH] sync script: copy history of ostree ref

> If we happen to miss a sync for whatever reason there could be > gaps in the ostree history. Adding --depth=-1 will make sure that > the entire history for the ref is in the target repo. > --- > roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

[PATCH] sync script: copy history of ostree ref

If we happen to miss a sync for whatever reason there could be gaps in the ostree history. Adding --depth=-1 will make sure that the entire history for the ref is in the target repo. --- roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

FBR: sync script: copy history of ostree ref

sync script: copy history of ostree ref ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

code looks correct and can be backed out easily. +1 On 10 November 2017 at 17:18, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > We can now do multi-arch ostrees for updates! \o/ > Can I get +1s to apply this patch to enable that for Fedora 27 and up? > > Thanks, > Patrick > > >

FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

Hi all, We can now do multi-arch ostrees for updates! \o/ Can I get +1s to apply this patch to enable that for Fedora 27 and up? Thanks, Patrick diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 1c6dc02..b0f6ab7 100644 ---

Re: FBR for disabling branched composes

On 11/10/2017 11:32 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/10/2017 08:07 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> Sorry, I just realized F27 modular is still in beta, so I am gonna leave it >> like that. >> >> New diff: >> >> diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched >> index

[PATCH] add syncing for f27-updates

--- roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync index a241eeb..35c9d58 100755 ---

FBR add syncing for f27-updates

add syncing for f27-updates ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR for 0-day release actions

On 11/10/2017 11:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/10/2017 08:17 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> As per Dusty comment, new patch: >> >> diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 >> b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 >> index 1629e2d..5b22659 100644 >> ---

Re: [PATCH] add syncing for f27-u-t ostree ref

+1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR for 0-day release actions

On 11/10/2017 08:17 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > As per Dusty comment, new patch: > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 > b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 > index 1629e2d..5b22659 100644 > --- a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 > +++

Re: FBR for disabling branched composes

On 11/10/2017 08:07 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Sorry, I just realized F27 modular is still in beta, so I am gonna leave it > like that. > > New diff: > > diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched > index 270a6a1..30e3928 100644 > --- a/roles/releng/files/branched >

Re: FBR for 0-day release actions

As per Dusty comment, new patch: diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 index 1629e2d..5b22659 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@

Re: FBR for disabling branched composes

Sorry, I just realized F27 modular is still in beta, so I am gonna leave it like that. New diff: diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched index 270a6a1..30e3928 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/branched +++ b/roles/releng/files/branched @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ # branched

Re: FBR for 0-day release actions

On 11/10/2017 10:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > As per 0-day Release Actions under > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/docs/sysadmin-guide/sops/bodhi.rst > SOP, I made the following changes: > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/atomic-config.py.j2 >

Re: FBR for 0-day release actions

+1 On 10 November 2017 at 10:35, Mohan Boddu wrote: > As per 0-day Release Actions under > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/docs/sysadmin-guide/sops/bodhi.rst > SOP, I made the following changes: > > diff --git

FBR for disabling branched composes

As we already have Gold RC compose, its time to disable nightlies. diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched index 270a6a1..e8f3f58 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/branched +++ b/roles/releng/files/branched @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ # branched compose

FBR for 0-day release actions

As per 0-day Release Actions under https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/docs/sysadmin-guide/sops/bodhi.rst SOP, I made the following changes: diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/atomic-config.py.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/atomic-config.py.j2 index