Re: FBR: Update Bodhi tree filenames for atomic-workstation

2018-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 03/09/2018 02:48 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > The filenames for atomic workstation treefiles changed from -ostree- to > -atomic-. > Can I get +1s? > > Patrick > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 >

Re: FBR: Update Bodhi tree filenames for atomic-workstation

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/09/2018 05:48 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > The filenames for atomic workstation treefiles changed from -ostree- to > -atomic-. > Can I get +1s? > LGTM.. we could just update the f27 branch to have a symlink so we don't have to special case it in the

FBR: Update Bodhi tree filenames for atomic-workstation

2018-03-09 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
Hi all, The filenames for atomic workstation treefiles changed from -ostree- to -atomic-. Can I get +1s? Patrick diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index ff31d400e..1561360d6 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/09/2018 04:44 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >> On 03/09/2018 04:25 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >> >> >> ok I'm using a pull request for this: >> >> https://gitlab.com/dustymabe/fedora-infra-ansible/merge_requests/1/diffs?w=1 >> >> here is the updated patch if

Re: [PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
> On 03/09/2018 04:25 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > > > ok I'm using a pull request for this: > > https://gitlab.com/dustymabe/fedora-infra-ansible/merge_requests/1/diffs?w=1 > > here is the updated patch if you want to fight with pulling it in from email: > > > > > From

Re: [PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/09/2018 04:25 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >> The f28 repos we need to tap into are not in the same locations >> as for post release (f26/f27) runs. We also don't need to include >> the 'updates' repo because there is no updates repo for f28 yet. >> > > This is actually an

Re: [PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
> The f28 repos we need to tap into are not in the same locations > as for post release (f26/f27) runs. We also don't need to include > the 'updates' repo because there is no updates repo for f28 yet. > This is actually an f28 repo, but I had made a mistake moving things around (I accidentally

Re: [PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Mohan Boddu
LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 03/09/2018 12:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > We need this patch to fix ostree in our f28 updates testing runs. > > See https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/63 Seems ok, +1. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

[PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
The f28 repos we need to tap into are not in the same locations as for post release (f26/f27) runs. We also don't need to include the 'updates' repo because there is no updates repo for f28 yet. Signed-off-by: Dusty Mabe --- roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2

FBR: bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
We need this patch to fix ostree in our f28 updates testing runs. See https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/63 Dusty ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: FBR: fix hooks for new packages on src.fedoraproject.org

2018-03-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 please do. On 9 March 2018 at 14:07, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> It was reported to me that a number of new packages were not showing up >> in grokmirror on src.fedoraproject.org. On looking I noted that new >> packages did not have the

Re: FBR: fix hooks for new packages on src.fedoraproject.org

2018-03-09 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
> Greetings. > > It was reported to me that a number of new packages were not showing up > in grokmirror on src.fedoraproject.org. On looking I noted that new > packages did not have the chained post-receive hook we normally put in > place. The cause seems to be a typo in the command. > > I'd

FBR: fix hooks for new packages on src.fedoraproject.org

2018-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. It was reported to me that a number of new packages were not showing up in grokmirror on src.fedoraproject.org. On looking I noted that new packages did not have the chained post-receive hook we normally put in place. The cause seems to be a typo in the command. I'd like to: * Apply

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

2018-03-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Correcting the statement: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora... > created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib *builds* from Everything > repo, this > should be fixed in

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

2018-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
+1 here. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/09/2018 01:11 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PQUO2BPFYAOHT4DPICFSUMSSQEXO6UT3/ > created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib arches from Everything > repo, this should be fixed in

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

2018-03-09 Thread Mohan Boddu
Correcting the statement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora... created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib *builds* from Everything repo, this should be fixed in pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27 ___ infrastructure

FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

2018-03-09 Thread Mohan Boddu
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PQUO2BPFYAOHT4DPICFSUMSSQEXO6UT3/ created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib arches from Everything repo, this should be fixed in pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27 koji build:

Re: FBR: Restart collectd

2018-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 03/09/2018 06:34 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > And it's done. Let's hope that that'll fix all of them Just to note I could have sworn I did this same thing after removing that config, but clearly I didn't or it didn't take somehow. Sorry for the error. kevin signature.asc Description:

Re: FBR: Restart collectd

2018-03-09 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
And it's done. Let's hope that that'll fix all of them. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Restart collectd

2018-03-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:54:13PM -, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > So, in ansible commit 2cce3883a34e5366e822fd581455f63344630c8c, Kevin > disabled the graphite plugin for collectd. > Unfortunately, at the same time, he removed the restart handler for collectd, >

Re: come learn about rpm-ostree rojig

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/09/2018 09:13 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Hey infra/releng, > > The Atomic WG is having a vFAD [1] The vFAD will be recorded so you should be able to watch it later if you can't make it. Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

come learn about rpm-ostree rojig

2018-03-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey infra/releng, The Atomic WG is having a vFAD [1] that starts at the turn of the next hour (10 AM Eastern). At the beginning Colin Walters will give a brief demo of rpm-ostree rojig [2] and we'll have a Q session afterwards. Please attend if

Re: FBR: Restart collectd

2018-03-09 Thread Ricky Elrod
Yep, +1 -re On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > So, in ansible commit 2cce3883a34e5366e822fd581455f63344630c8c, Kevin > disabled the graphite plugin for collectd. > Unfortunately, at the same time, he removed the restart

FBR: Restart collectd

2018-03-09 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
Hi all, So, in ansible commit 2cce3883a34e5366e822fd581455f63344630c8c, Kevin disabled the graphite plugin for collectd. Unfortunately, at the same time, he removed the restart handler for collectd, which means that all of our boxes are still running with the old config, slowly filling up