Re: [PATCH] Add initial aarch64 devices to the inventory

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:13:16 + Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: The plan is to do exactly that, reuse as much as possible and diverge as little as possible. I'd found those playbooks already (thanks grep

[PATCH] dhcp: add aarch64-04a host config

--- roles/dhcp_server/files/dhcpd.conf.noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/roles/dhcp_server/files/dhcpd.conf.noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org b/roles/dhcp_server/files/dhcpd.conf.noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org index 2ed568e..68a363f 100644 ---

Re: [ba...@list.org: [Mailman-Developers] ANNOUNCING: GNU Mailman 3.0]

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: Is anyone working on Mailman 3/HyperKitty for Fedora now that it is released? I don't see any packages in Fedora yet. There was an instance running in staging a while back, not sure if it still is. There's also an up to date

Re: Freeze Break request: switch bodhi over for 0 day updates

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: With our release, we need to switch bodhi over to making regular 0 day updates and prep it for f23 updates someday. I'd apply this patch and then the 0 day release actions in the bodhi sop at

Freeze break request: minor change to host ordering priorities

When building ppc builders which reside on qa.fedoraproject.org we get the wrong /etc/hosts file because the generic ansible_domain executes before the more specific due to task host_group option. In general I believe if we have something explicitly in a host_group we'd want to prioritise that

Re: Freeze break request: minor change to host ordering priorities

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:24:46PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: When building ppc builders which reside on qa.fedoraproject.org we get the wrong /etc/hosts file because the generic ansible_domain executes before

Re: Freeze break request: minor change to host ordering priorities

Sounds ok to me, do we have a way to check which hosts are impacted by this change? Kevin says he has a report that check/diff report what machines would change based on it Yeah, if we push this change now, I can tell you tomorrow any hosts that would have changed. ;) Pushed I'm +1 to

Re: [release] MirrorManager2: 0.4.1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:42:44PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good morning everyone, I just released a new version of MirrorManager2: 0.4.1 Here is its changelog: * Tue Jul 28 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon

Re: Freeze break request: [post] Add a pagure.org - pagure.io redirect

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Could I get retroactive +1s for the following commit, which fixes pagure.org urls (instaad of getting them trapped in the docs.pagure.org vhost). Seems to work

Re: Freeze break: add rsyncd to s390 hub

+1 from me On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: This is needed so the content can be synced over to secondary01 and made live to end users. +1s? diff --git a/playbooks/groups/koji-hub.yml b/playbooks/groups/koji-hub.yml index aaccbca..be1843c 100644 ---

Re: Freeze break: add rsyncd to s390 hub

Looks fine, +1 On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: So, I applied that, but we need some additional changes. ;( First, the secondary01 host uses the external ip to talk to the s390 hub, so we need to allow that. Secondly, the ansible_fqdn for the s390 hub isn't

Re: fedrtc.org -> infrastructure?

>>> What is the best way to proceed from here? Would anybody like to >>> have an IRC meeting to discuss it perhaps, or to have it on the >>> agenda at one of the weekly infrastructure meetings? Is there >>> anybody from the infrastructure team who would like to login to >>> the lab server where

Re: Migration to HyperKitty / Mailman 3

> Since it's Friday evening, I just unilateraly decided to migrate all > the lists to Mailman3 without telling you anything in advance... Nah > just kidding :-) > > However, I think the best time to migrate the rest of the lists would > be the week before Thanksgiving. That would give me some time

Re: [Freeze Break] Pagure 2.2.1

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> With some of the changes in 2.2 we broke a couple of things on pagure and >> since >> we're still

Re: non free builders

> So, we pride ourselves on having a 100% free and open infrastructure > software wise. However, we have had some exceptions (the autocloud vbox > test machine, etc). > > For f24, the plan is to make workstation downloads at least prefer to > download a usb media creator, and then that downloads

Re: Freeze break request: add PPC range to PHX2 DNS view

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > This will make sure that the new PPC net is able to resolve the netapp > and use the internal proxies (which makes it work with the build firewall). > > Can I get any +1s? +1 from me, I might be biased ;-)

Re: Freeze break: db-koji01 tuning

> -work_mem = 2MB # min 64kB > -maintenance_work_mem = 1024MB # min 1MB > +{% if ansible_hostname.startswith("db-koji01") %} > +work_mem = 4MB # min 64kB > +maintenance_work_mem = 16MB # min 1MB Was it intended to drop

Re: Freeze break: db01 tuning

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:32:37 +0000 > Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (and can we do the other koji instances that are in ansible too - >> IE arm and s390 if they were

Re: Freeze break: db01 tuning

> I was going to wait until after freeze to mess with the other > postgresql hosts, but then mattdm pointed out this morning that > hyperkitty is really slow currently. I'm not sure this will help, but > it really make db-koji01 a great deal happier and it should be pretty > easy to revert if

Re: Freeze break request

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I need to update the compose boxes across all arches to > python-productmd-1.0-13.fc23 > pungi-4.0.10-1.fc23 > > in order to fix compose failure on rawhide last night and enable a feature > requested by QA. there may be an

Re: [PATCH] install the runroot koji plugin on the arm and ppc compose boxes

On 11 Mar 2016 4:51 pm, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:22:28 + > den...@ausil.us wrote: > > > From: Dennis Gilmore > > > > Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore > > --- > > inventory/builders | 3 +++ > > 1 file

Re: Freeze break request: Upgrade FAS to 0.12.0 and open firewall on db-fas01 from basset01

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Could I get +1s for the following things: +1 from me. > 1. Upgrade FAS to 0.12.0: this release includes hooks for spam checks, and is > currently running in Staging. > 2. Installation of basset01.phx2

Re: Freeze Break Request: Clean up iptables on all boxes.

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 March 2016 at 17:09, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> And we

Re: Freeze break: link on pkgs lookaside for fedpkg namespace changes

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > In recent fedpkg/rpkg versions (at least the ones in rawhide now) it's > incorrectly looking for a namespaced (rpms vs anything else) lookaside > instead of the non namespaced one we have. > > So, this gives: >

Re: Freeze break: nfsv4 testing on backup01

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > With the netapp maint last night, we may be able to finally take > advantage of nfsv4 mounts. I'd like to take backup01 (when it's not > doing any backups, ie, before 22UTC when they start) and do some > testing

Re: Freeze Break request: sync up fedmsg rules

> time ansible-playbook /srv/web/infra/ansible/master.yml -t > fedmsgdconfig,fedmsgmonitor > > ie, the fedmsgdconfig and fedmsgmonitor tags over all hosts. > > The reason is that we added a new fedmsg cert for the not yet active > ppc-hub. So, this shouldn't change much at all, but it will make

Re: Freeze Break Request: mark WD drives as not multipath

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Could I get +1s for this patch set? > This will blacklist drives from WD from becoming multipath > devices, which will fix the newly replaced drive in buildvmhost-11. +1 here

Re: build kernel under Fedora - not work

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > I try to build kernel linux today. > I have this two web links to do that: The infrastructure list isn't the right spot for this, the kernel list is for that. > 1.

Re: Freeze break request: Update Autocloud tests

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > On 23/08/16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 23 August 2016 at 14:41, Kushal Das wrote: >> > On 22/08/16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> On 22 August 2016 at 02:12, Kushal Das

Re: Freeze Break Request pungi update

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > We have fixed a few bugs in pungi for supporting the workstation ostree > installer and I would like to get pung-4.1.10 deployed on the compose boxes. > > The upstream change log is: > - pungi: Replace kickstart

Re: [Freeze Break Request] Bodhi: Fix large updates

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Hello! > > Today I released bodhi-2.2.3 upstream, to address an issue where too > many taskotron results are being rendered on large updates, which > causes browsers to run out of memory[0]. 2.2.3 contains only

Re: FBR: Update createrepo_c on bodhi-backend03

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just found the root cause of another update push issue > regarding the repocache. > This was caused by createrepo_c not closing updateinfo.xml.bz2 after > it's done with it, which > caused NFS to

Re: Freeze Break Request: Fix koji hub for rawhide clients

+1 if it's still needed. P On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > +1 > > This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393579 FYI > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list --

Re: [freeze break] Add alt.fedoraproject.org to production's syncTranslation script

+1 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > +1 Sorry for the delay > > On 13 November 2016 at 16:40, Robert Mayr wrote: >> We are going to release a new website, which is running in staging now, but >> for production I need to

FBR: enable aarch64 for EPEL-7 in bodhi

Hi, I'd like to enable aarch64 for EPEL-7, I was going to wait until post F-25 GA but given we've slipped I'd like to get approval for FBR. The change in mash configs for bodhi is as below. Peter diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testing.mash

Re: [PATCH] update the pre release policy for f26

+1 from me On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, wrote: > From: Dennis Gilmore > > Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore > --- > roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 | 16 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8

Re: Freeze break request: fix f24 references in f25-updates-testing atomic updates

+1 from me! On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > From f55c6f20bc5676f62a50535dbe5c1d1eb74aae4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kevin Fenzi > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:42:19 + > Subject: [PATCH] fix fedora-25-updates-testing to have

Re: FBR: apply patch to bodhi-backend03

+1 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get +1s for applying the patch at [1] to bodhi-backend03? > This should fix the SSL problem that occurs during mashing. > > [1]: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1122 > > Regards, >

Re: FBR: enable aarch64 for EPEL-7 in bodhi

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > +0 I would like to wait until CentOS-7 is out. What do you mean by this? CentOS-7 for aarch64? It's already out. Or do you mean 7.3 for aarch64? I've been liaising with Jim Perrin on this from the aarch64

Re: FBR: enable aarch64 for EPEL-7 in bodhi

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > That is the data point I wanted. What, you didn't think I was actively engaged with Jim right through this entire process? So is that now a +1? > On 14 November 2016 at 16:58, wrote: >> If I

Re: Freeze Break Request: Remove Dell-fx- from various playbook files.

+1 with that explanation. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > +1, but shouldn't affect any frozen hosts so go for it. ;) > > To clarify the plans for these machines: > > 10 of them are going to become the new buildhw-01 to buildhw-10 > 2 of them are going to

Access to various bits of Fedora infra over long distance

Hi All, Just thought I'd give some feedback after using Fedora infra over a long distance from the data centre. I'm on the NBN Sky muster satellite [1] from Aus (it's dual stack v4/v6 for reference too). Most services are quite usable (koji/wiki is fine) but there are some that just don't load

Re: Access to various bits of Fedora infra over long distance

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 December 2016 at 21:14, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Just thought I'd give some feedback after using Fedora infra over a >> long d

Re: F25 wifi running at 1MB/s

This is off topic for Fedora infrastructure list which is about the Fedora hosted infra, not kernel device problems (although the problem you mention with that wifi chip/that device is a known problem upstream). Peter On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:53 PM, InvalidPath wrote: >

Re: FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Turns out that these three services were not yet using our global > secure cipher set. > This means that they have the Apache defaults, which are quite > insecure (RC4 and no FS). > Can I please get +1s to

Re: Freeze break: cleanup some epel5 remnants

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > We are still trying to sync pkgdb to koji for epel5 packages as well as > syncing the epel5 updates/updates-testing repos to pub. This patch stops > both those since epel5 is EOL now. > > +1s? +1 > kevin > -- >>

Re: [PATCH] unfreeze rawhide-composer

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:52 PM, wrote: > From: Dennis Gilmore > > rawhide-composer should never have been frozen. it has no impact on the > release deliverables, and we may want to deploy changes needing changes > on the compose box or update packages

Re: Freeze Break Request: fix f26 updates-testing mash config

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > This config needs fixing so we can push out f26-updates-testing > updates. > > +1s? +1 was this already pushed? > -- > From 213b0df0fffa07ccbee5fbd848812d05b61bea2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kevin Fenzi

Re: [PATCH] sync to ALTDEST for alternative arches

Did you need a ACK/NACK for freeze for this? If so +1 On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:50 PM, wrote: > From: Dennis Gilmore > > Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore > --- > roles/bodhi2/backend/files/fedora-updates-push | 9 + > 1

Re: Where do we want to put pagure?

> On 08/01/2017 04:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:23:13PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> In stg I put it under src.stg.fp.o/pagure so it stands nicely on the side of >>> everything else on the server and to be sure it is not going to conflict. >>> But, do we want

Re: [FBR] Retroactive: Temporarily put the s390 cache at the end to prevent failing all builds

+1 from me On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Our s390 caching builder (buildvm-s390x-07) has suddenly dropped of > the network, failing all primary s390x builds, since Koji seemingly > doesn't (anymore) fall back to secondary urls for

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered > Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift as a backend > technology that FLIBS is built on top of. > > TL;DR - Does

Re: Freeze break request: unset accept-encoding early

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > This was debugged and sorted out by dusty and patrick... but I'll put up the > freeze break. > > +1s? +1 from me > kevin > -- > commit 21567213544015bba8390c096543d892cf5bb563 > Author: Patrick Uiterwijk

Re: FBR: Update Koji hubs to build with encoding patch

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > Can I get +1s to update Koji on the hubs to 1.12.0-4, as built on > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=900865? > > The added patch is the patch from >

Re: FBR: Update Koji hubs to build with encoding patch

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > So, turns out we need one more small patch > (https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/449.patch). > > I have now submitted the koji builds. > > Can I get +1s for that patch addition? Looks sane +1

Re: FBR: Configure Bodhi to use pre-beta policy on F27

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Peter notified me today that Bodhi had not been configured to use the > pre-beta policy on F27 when the F27 release was created in Bodhi. This > patch should do the trick. +1 from me, can we also update the SOP

Re: Retroactive FBR

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I want to apologize profusely -- I pushed a tiny change to the email > aliases and completely failed to consider they are covered by FBR > requirement. > >

Re: FBR: Remove old files from /pub/fedora /pub/fedora-secondary

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The actions to do this would be the following: +1 > $ sudo -i ssh r...@bodhi-backend01.phx2.fedoraproject.org > # su - -s /bin/bash ftpsync > # cd /pub/fedora/linux/releases/22 > # rm -rvf ./* > # ln -s

Re: Freeze break request: add pki redirects to proxies

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Per https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6375 I would like to > add the following redirects and run the proxy playbooks. > > +1s? +1 from me > kevin > -- >> diff --git

Re: FBR: upgrade buildvm-armv7-01/02

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > After we started using the new buildvm-armv7 vm's (that are running on > aarch64 virthosts) for builds, we also tried to use them for nightly > composes. However, for whatever reasons, they would hang and become

Re: Freeze break request: update ppc64/ppc64le/s390x builders

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I ran out of time on reinstalling builders with f26 and didn't get to > the ppc64/ppc64le/s390x ones. > > We are doing some testing of rich deps in rawhide that needs the latest > f25 update for libsolv on

Re: Python 3.6 in EPEL7

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hey folks! > > I have a need for Python 3.5+ in EPEL7 (newest versions of Mailman 3 require > it), so I tried rebuilding the Python 3.6 RPM as a parallel-installable > package by taking advantage of our

Re: Updates for AtomicHost artifacts in bodhi pungi runs

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > [PATCH 1/5] bodhi-pungi: f29 will be new branched target > [PATCH 2/5] bodhi-pungi: convert image-build to use non branched > [PATCH 3/5] bodhi-pungi: only provide one repo to lorax > [PATCH 4/5] bodhi-pungi: s/Atomic/AtomicHost/ > [PATCH 5/5]

Re: Freeze Break Request: update oz on image builders

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Rawhide composes have been failing recently due to kernel changes that > landed in the 4.17 rc2 (and thus all later) kernels. This change causes > vm's made by oz (our cloud image creator) to not have enough

Re: Let's flip the switch on January 15th: gating in Fedora

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Dominik Perpeet wrote: > Dear Fedora Infra, > > it's time to close the CI feedback loop! > > We have been working on adding CI to Fedora for a little while now but this > has not really had a visible effect since there are no consequences when

Re: Compose tooling completed deadline today

Hi Infra team, The schedule[1] says today is the deadline for compose tooling completed. Are we good on this or are there still changes to that in flight? [1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-29/f-29-infrastructure.html >>> I'm not fully sure what

Re: FBR: Update new-updates-sync for f28(m) updates-testing

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk >> > >> Comment inline below. >> >> >> I think aarch64 should be up with the ['x86_64', 'armhfp', >> 'source'] list

Re: FBR: Update new-updates-sync for f28(m) updates-testing

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > Can I get +1s to fix up new-updates-sync to fix syncing f28 to the correct > directory, and f28m (modular) as well? Comment inline below. > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync >

Re: FBR: Add f28 testing location

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > Turns out in the last Bodhi 3.5 FBR, I'd added > fedora_28_stable_master_repomd, but forgot the _testing one. > Can I get +1s for this patch? > > Patrick > > diff --git

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Correcting the statement: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora... > created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib *builds* from Everything > repo, this > should be fixed in

Re: Freeze Break Request: More debugging on armv7 composer vm

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > For a long while we were plagued by a issue where our > buildvm-armv7-01/02/03 vm's would get 'stuck' on nightly rawhide and > branched composes. > > Laura found a workaround for this issue where we set a

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-7.fc27

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > We were having issues with modular rpms ending up in Everything repo and also > missing Container variant, which should be fixed by pungi-4.1.22-7.fc27 > update. > > koji build:

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

Thanks Patrick, Sounds like a herculean effort, you might want to send this to devel@ as a FYI, you can never be quite sure what community gets up to so a heads up there is likely useful for someone there too. P On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, 07:27 Patrick Uiterwijk, wrote: > Hi

Re: FBR: Allow anonymous HTTPS pulling via in-Pagure systems

Seems sane +1 from me On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:52 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > > Hi all, > > This should be my last FBR for now, as with this I tested everything in > staging, and I believe it works there (SSH pull/push and HTTPS pull, we don't > have HTTPS push for pagure.io

Re: FBR: Stop emailing puiterwijk for ticketkey and add nagios check

Seems fine +1 On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:39 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can I get +1s to make Nagios check the ticketkey age and to make it stop > email me hourly? > > Thanks, > Patrick > > > commit 3fc57e699b9c524d5683fcc39231f7b1f425bbb9 (HEAD -> master) > Author:

Re: FBR: Make clime be on the pager for COPR

LGTM +1 On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:54 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can I get +1s for the patchset to allow clime to ack service and host issues > in nagios, and to make the initial COPR notifs go to him? > > Patrick > > > From 1994c662f8eabcec78f24a8d7b2edc155d25bac2

Re: FBR: Add hosts to DNS for osbs-aarch64

This one looks good. A massively large +1 from me :-D > mizdebsk found problems and so this cleans them up > > diff --git a/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa b/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa > index 56d713d..dd53359 100644 > --- a/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa > +++ b/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa > @@

Re: FBR: Add hosts to DNS for osbs-aarch64

> +30INPTR osbs-aarch64-master01.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org. > +31INPTR osbs-aarch64-node01.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org. > +32INPTR osbs-aarch64-node02.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org. > +33INPTR

Re: Freeze break request: update/reboot aarch64-c23n1/c24n1

+1 from me On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:42 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > We are trying to install a aarch64 osbs node for staging so we can get > multi-arch containers building, but for some reason the install is not > completing correctly. It seems to hang at: > > [ OK ] Started

Re: [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: pass in ostree_oskey to fedora-lorax-templates

On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 7:58 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > On 12/1/18 2:43 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > patch looks good. should apply ok. > > Merged and playbook ran. Thanks smooge Thanks Dusty. P ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: [Freeze Break Request] Add zchunk support to updates and updates-testing repositories

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 6:01 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 3/30/19 9:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Great, thanks! I'll be keeping an eye on the composes to see if there > >> are any issues. > > > > Wasn't this disabled in the main Fedora branched compose? I

Re: [Freeze Break Request] Add zchunk support to updates and updates-testing repositories

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 11:10 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 16:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 3/30/19 3:32 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 15:13 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On 3/30/19 11:35 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: cloud retirement

> Hey everyone. > > As you know, we currently have a RHOSP5 ancient cloud. After a bunch of > work last year, we got a RHOSP13 cloud up and mostly working, but it was > a ton of work. After hearing from the Fedora Council and our various > management chains we determined that it wouldn't really be

Re: FBR: upgrade oz on builders

> > To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve > > it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current > > "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by > > default, to use UEFI you can specify F-30 and if edk2 is available it > > will

FBR: upgrade oz on builders

To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by default, to use UEFI you can specify F-30 and if edk2 is available it will use that by default.

Re: FBR: upgrade oz on builders

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:55 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve > it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current > "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by > def

Re: FBR: upgrade oz on builders

> > To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve > > it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current > > "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by > > default, to use UEFI you can specify F-30 and if edk2 is available it > > will

Re: How do we turn zchunk on for updates-testing for F30?

> On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 21:29 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:29 PM Jonathan Dieter > > wrote: > > > Hey, I just noticed that, while we have zchunked metadata for the > > > F30 > > > base repository, it's not enabled to for updates-testing. > > > > > > I've looked in

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

> > Hey all, > > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python > > 3 wherever possible: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4 > > > > The PR is a bit complex, but it's based on the upstream spec for Koji, > > which accounts for all the variations

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

> > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python > > > > 3 wherever possible: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4 > > > > > > > > The PR is a bit complex, but it's based on the upstream spec for Koji, > > > > which

Re: FBR: make iot.fp.o live

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:02 PM Rick Elrod wrote: > > This has been in stg for a while, and I have been asked to make it live. > > This FBR is for permission to commit this and run the proxy playbook on > all proxies. +1 (but might be biased) > Rick > > > > commit

Re: [Freeze Break Request: ] buildvmhost-aarch64-01/01: Add dhcp info for 2 thunderx2 aarch64 buildvmhosts.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 5:09 PM wrote: > > From: Kevin Fenzi > > We need to add these in so pxe sees the right thing to boot them. +1 from me > Signed-off-by: Kevin Fenzi > --- > .../files/dhcpd.conf.noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org| 16 > > 1 file changed, 16

Re: FBR: Switch docs.fp.o over to openshift-built

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 2:31 PM Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > Hi, > > Can I get +1s for the patch underneath? > This will switch from /srv/web/docs (synced from externally built docs > sources) to /srv/docs (mount point for doc build outputs built in > openshift). > This is tested in staging, and

Re: Fedora 31: Noninstallable Python 2 packages to be retired just before the beta freeze

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:25 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > In line with the approved Fedora 31 change, packages that fail to install due > to > missing Python 2 dependencies are to be removed. I plan to retire the > following > packages (or just drop their python2 subpackages) one day before the

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 27. 09. 19 v 23:55 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > > * Populate the new datacenter with new hardware to replace old hardware > > > that > > > either wouldn’t survive the

Re: Freeze break request: update comps for rename of 'dnf-yum' to 'yum'

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 4:15 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to > > > comps-f31.xml.in): > > > > > >

Re: FBR : update robosignatory

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:52 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:47:00PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:41 PM Aurelien Bompard > > wrote: > > > > > > Hey folks, > > > > > > Last Monda

Re: FBR : update robosignatory

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:41 PM Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks, > > Last Monday, before the freeze, we updated Robosignatory in prod with a few > new features, some of which could not be tested in staging as thoroughly as > we wanted to. As a result, the version currently in prod has

Re: Freeze Break Request: Fix pungi configs of F32 for kickstarts

> Current pungi configs are using kickstarts from master branch, instead > they should use f32 branch. > > This should be fixed by: > > https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/812 > > Look at the last change which is this FBR is totally about. Reviewed the change and +1 from me. > Thanks >

Re: Freeze Break Request: koji 1.20.1

+1 from me On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > There's several smallish issues in our koji: > > * texlive doesn't build ( https://pagure.io/koji/issue/1119 ) > * you can't use the interface to look at newRepo and other tasks made by > a sidetag thats since been

  1   2   >