Re: Followup on Atomic composes

2014-07-24 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014, at 05:40 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:07:39AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: In the meantime though, Atomic still needs a mechanism to *try* code that's in development. So I may look at having the internal compose server be a pull from COPR type

Re: Followup on Atomic composes

2014-07-23 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 07/22/2014 10:07 PM, Colin Walters wrote: From: 15:36:25 dgilmore walters: i have it working for the TC/RC process. I need to change up a few things. not yet looked at doing it for rawhide/branched yet Are there any blockers to setting up the rawhide/branched parts? Anything I can help

Followup on Atomic composes

2014-07-22 Thread Colin Walters
From: 15:36:25 dgilmore walters: i have it working for the TC/RC process. I need to change up a few things. not yet looked at doing it for rawhide/branched yet Are there any blockers to setting up the rawhide/branched parts? Anything I can help with? In particular, will these composes write

Re: Followup on Atomic composes

2014-07-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:07:39AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: In the meantime though, Atomic still needs a mechanism to *try* code that's in development. So I may look at having the internal compose server be a pull from COPR type thing and thus be a remix (again), but improve on the current