Re: mirrorlist-server fix is in testing
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:34:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sounds good. I can look at updating them over the weekend or early next > week. All of them should be updated now. I updated 3 of the proxies (02/09/13) to f32... will do the rest as time permits. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: mirrorlist-server fix is in testing
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:11:25AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:02:35PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > Currently there is a bug open against our mirrorlist servers that > > > certain locations have trouble, especially with the > > > fedora-cisco-openh264 repository, getting a list of up to date mirrors. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844087 > > > > > > This has been fixed upstream and is available from testing: > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f86d3b3196 > > > > > > As Fedora Infrastructure is, so far, the only user of this package > > > nobody besides us can/will test it. > > > > > > Can we install it on one of our proxies and see if it still works and if > > > it actually fixes the problems which have been reported? > > > > Yep. > > > > > I cannot install anything on the proxies myself, so somebody would need > > > to install that package and restart the corresponding services and let > > > me know. There is no staging, but maybe there are proxies which are > > > currently not active which could be used for a test like this. > > > > I installed it on proxy05 (since thats a slower/lower resource one) > > lets let it run there for a few days at least. > > > > It seems to be running normally from what I can see so far.. > > Thanks. Seems to work as before and the error is also fixed: > > $ curl > "127.0.0.1:18081/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-cisco-openh264-32=x86_64=141.58.0.0" > # repo = fedora-cisco-openh264-32 arch = x86_64 Using ASN 553 country = > global > https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/32/x86_64/ > > The update will reach stable in one day according to bodhi, so we can > install it soon on all proxies. Sounds good. I can look at updating them over the weekend or early next week. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: mirrorlist-server fix is in testing
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:02:35PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > Currently there is a bug open against our mirrorlist servers that > > certain locations have trouble, especially with the > > fedora-cisco-openh264 repository, getting a list of up to date mirrors. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844087 > > > > This has been fixed upstream and is available from testing: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f86d3b3196 > > > > As Fedora Infrastructure is, so far, the only user of this package > > nobody besides us can/will test it. > > > > Can we install it on one of our proxies and see if it still works and if > > it actually fixes the problems which have been reported? > > Yep. > > > I cannot install anything on the proxies myself, so somebody would need > > to install that package and restart the corresponding services and let > > me know. There is no staging, but maybe there are proxies which are > > currently not active which could be used for a test like this. > > I installed it on proxy05 (since thats a slower/lower resource one) > lets let it run there for a few days at least. > > It seems to be running normally from what I can see so far.. Thanks. Seems to work as before and the error is also fixed: $ curl "127.0.0.1:18081/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-cisco-openh264-32=x86_64=141.58.0.0" # repo = fedora-cisco-openh264-32 arch = x86_64 Using ASN 553 country = global https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/32/x86_64/ The update will reach stable in one day according to bodhi, so we can install it soon on all proxies. Adrian signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: mirrorlist-server fix is in testing
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > Currently there is a bug open against our mirrorlist servers that > certain locations have trouble, especially with the > fedora-cisco-openh264 repository, getting a list of up to date mirrors. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844087 > > This has been fixed upstream and is available from testing: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f86d3b3196 > > As Fedora Infrastructure is, so far, the only user of this package > nobody besides us can/will test it. > > Can we install it on one of our proxies and see if it still works and if > it actually fixes the problems which have been reported? Yep. > I cannot install anything on the proxies myself, so somebody would need > to install that package and restart the corresponding services and let > me know. There is no staging, but maybe there are proxies which are > currently not active which could be used for a test like this. I installed it on proxy05 (since thats a slower/lower resource one) lets let it run there for a few days at least. It seems to be running normally from what I can see so far.. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
mirrorlist-server fix is in testing
Currently there is a bug open against our mirrorlist servers that certain locations have trouble, especially with the fedora-cisco-openh264 repository, getting a list of up to date mirrors. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844087 This has been fixed upstream and is available from testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f86d3b3196 As Fedora Infrastructure is, so far, the only user of this package nobody besides us can/will test it. Can we install it on one of our proxies and see if it still works and if it actually fixes the problems which have been reported? I cannot install anything on the proxies myself, so somebody would need to install that package and restart the corresponding services and let me know. There is no staging, but maybe there are proxies which are currently not active which could be used for a test like this. Adrian ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
