Re: Let's flip the switch on January 15th: gating in Fedora

2018-01-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Dominik Perpeet wrote: > Dear Fedora Infra, > > it's time to close the CI feedback loop! > > We have been working on adding CI to Fedora for a little while now but this > has not really had a visible effect since there are no consequences when

Re: Deploying JS-based application (Hubs)

2018-01-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 01:32:00PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 5 January 2018 at 05:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > There has been work on fedora-hubs for a while now and there is an > > objective to > > make it live in staging

Re: Let's flip the switch on January 15th: gating in Fedora

2018-01-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:35:50AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > The tests run by the Atomic CI pipeline are controlled directly by the > > packager: > > * Files in dist-git define which tests are run > > What do you think? > Has this been to FESCo? That's probably a good next step. > > It

Re: Let's flip the switch on January 15th: gating in Fedora

2018-01-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:04:50AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:35:50AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > The tests run by the Atomic CI pipeline are controlled directly by the > > > packager: > > > * Files in dist-git define which tests are run > > > What do you

Re: Let's flip the switch on January 15th: gating in Fedora

2018-01-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Well only packages with tests (and part of Fedora Atomic for now) > will be gated on test results, nothing will change for the others :) Oh yeah, we discussed this. The opt-in is having tests in the right place, basically. That

Re: Let's flip the switch on January 15th: gating in Fedora

2018-01-08 Thread 'Dominik Perpeet'
On 01/08/2018 03:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Oh yeah, we discussed this. The opt-in is having tests in the right > place, basically. That seems reasonable. > Exactly. Aside from greenwave options, each packager has complete control over which tests are enabled via the files in the dist-git

Re: Deploying JS-based application (Hubs)

2018-01-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 8 January 2018 at 11:21, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > >> Reading this and knowing the dependencies that node apps tend to have, I >> wonder >> if using containers with a very strict dependency list isn't the best >> middle >> ground. > > > I was thinking along those