Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-24 Thread Michal Novotny
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:43 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 11:30, Michal Novotny wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> could we use this? >> >> https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest > > > While I don't have a strong preference for one or the other, the main reason > we decided to

Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-12 Thread Randy Barlow
On 09/12/2018 04:01 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > [0] https://github.com/dhatim/python-license-check This looks useful, thanks for sharing! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 09/12/2018 03:44 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: >> I like the CI test idea, a little bit like when we tests that the code base >> is pep8 compliant or the test coverage in above 90%. There are a couple of >> python packages that could be useful to help with that [0] [1]. >> >> [0]

Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-12 Thread Aurelien Bompard
> I like the CI test idea, a little bit like when we tests that the code base > is pep8 compliant or the test coverage in above 90%. There are a couple of > python packages that could be useful to help with that [0] [1]. > > [0] https://github.com/dhatim/python-license-check > [1]

Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-12 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 09:40, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > everything should be there for > > this with one exception: We really want to have some check in place for > > s2i so that it checks license, so we don't accidentally push out > > something thats not under a open source license. This

Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-12 Thread Aurelien Bompard
> everything should be there for > this with one exception: We really want to have some check in place for > s2i so that it checks license, so we don't accidentally push out > something thats not under a open source license. This doesn't need to be > a blocker, but it would be great to get in

Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

2018-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 09/11/2018 11:48 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start working on the replacement application for PDC in > Fedora. So far I have been mostly looking at the technical side of the > application and how it will be setup in our infrastructure. > > Below is a list of the