On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:37 PM David Kirwan wrote:
> Merged the changes in the PyJWT PR into the fedora-infra fork, tagged a
> release 1.5.0, and sent in a PR against the RPM to now point at this fork +
> new version:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-oidc/pull-request/2
>
Merged the changes in the PyJWT PR into the fedora-infra fork, tagged a
release 1.5.0, and sent in a PR against the RPM to now point at this fork +
new version:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-oidc/pull-request/2
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 11:19, David Kirwan wrote:
>
>
> On Thu,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 08:30, Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:25 AM David Kirwan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the update, David!
>
> Would it be possible to cut a new release with the pyJWT PR included at
> least once you have time/mood to re-focus? Or would that be
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:25 AM David Kirwan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 03:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > \o/,
>> >
>> > I'd like to ask if there is anybody f
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 03:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
> >
> > \o/,
> >
> > I'd like to ask if there is anybody familiar with the state of
> flask-oidc? It's been long-time broken with the latest itsdange
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> \o/,
>
> I'd like to ask if there is anybody familiar with the state of flask-oidc?
> It's been long-time broken with the latest itsdangerous, which was recently
> bumped in Rawhide, which broke all the application
\o/,
I'd like to ask if there is anybody familiar with the state of flask-oidc?
It's been long-time broken with the latest itsdangerous, which was recently
bumped in Rawhide, which broke all the applications using flask-oidc from
Fedora repositories ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
