Nadim - you are polluting this ML with your insensitive comments. No
one around here wants that kind of counter productive input. What
part of Open Source don't you get? All of us here are volunteers of
some kind or another, so we don't appreciate being told what to do, and
how to act with
On Friday 04 October 2002 09:04, Brian Ingerson wrote:
I've been thinking about the following related things:
- How to support multiple implementations of the same language.
- How to support multiple glue layers in a single language.
- How to support different parsers in a language.
On 05/10/02 09:57 +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Brian Ingerson wrote:
Mark Fowler wrote:
RT notifies the author of the module automatically. You can add anyone
(well anyone with a RT login/CPAN id) as another watcher, and we can add
ourselves too.
Well let's try it.
On 05/10/02 13:43 +0200, nadim wrote:
On Friday 04 October 2002 09:04, Brian Ingerson wrote:
I've been thinking about the following related things:
- How to support multiple implementations of the same language.
- How to support multiple glue layers in a single language.
- How
On 04/10/02 22:53 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:59:24PM -0700, Brian Ingerson wrote:
http://ttul.org/~ingy/release/Inline-0.44-TRIAL2.tar.gz
Another day, another release.
This should cover most of what everybody requested today. I'd be
appreciative if the
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian Ingerson wrote:
I think I would have to add a directive for this. Something like this:
use Inline C = WAIT = NAME = Foo = VERSION = '1.23';
...multiple blocks...
use Inline C = 'FINISH';
Would that work? Let me know and I'll add it in.
Sounds
On Saturday, October 5, 2002, at 02:50 PM, Brian Ingerson wrote:
There are a few rules when making Inline modules:
- One Inline block per module.
- NAME must be the same as the module package.
- If you really want two objects you must put them in separate
modules with
