Nadim - you are polluting this ML with your insensitive comments. No
one around here wants that kind of counter productive input. What
part of Open Source don't you get? All of us here are volunteers of
some kind or another, so we don't appreciate being told what to do, and
how to act with
people interested
in what you have to say.
So another +1 for Brian.
Cheers,
Patrick
From: Piers Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nadim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: About Inline 0.50
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:50:15 +0100
OK - I think this goes far enough.
I for one am
I want to say a few words about Inline 0.50.
The last year has been a big learning experience for me. I got the chance to
learn some things about XP programming. The main points were:
- Write failing tests before coding a feature
- Build up solid regression tests
- Constantly
Hi All,
Inline 0.50 is much like messiah, We wait and wait and hope keeps us
waiting still he doesn't come. and it comes, we might not recognize it.
You write yourself things like : You'll never believe it, but I actually
just put a release on the web site. Well I didn't have time to check yet
On 03/10/02 20:19 +0200, nadim wrote:
Hi All,
Inline 0.50 is much like messiah, We wait and wait and hope keeps us
waiting still he doesn't come. and it comes, we might not recognize it.
You write yourself things like : You'll never believe it, but I actually
just put a release on the
On Thursday 03 October 2002 21:03, Brian wrote:
- You have no schedule
I have a schedule now. Talk to ORA :)
I've never seen ORA as an inline user. They want a book to make
money,period. I want a more usable Inline to have fun. The schedule is for
the book not for Inline. You might be mixing
