Sorry, please disregard. I need coffee.
Lars
On 2015-6-26, at 13:17, Lucy yong lucy.y...@huawei.com wrote:
Lars,
I am confused by your comment. This thread is about GRE encapsulation over
IPv6 network. Not about UDP encapsulation.
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Eggert, Lars
Hi Lucy,
I am reluctant to mandate a configuration option that causes the GRE ingress
node to set the Checksum present field to one. Rationale follows:
Imagine a packet traveling across the Internet. Depending on the packet type,
some portions of the packet are protected by checksums and other
Hi,
the UDP checksum field is not a codepoint to exchange configuration information
in.
In other words, zero has been a special case since the first specification of
UDP. But all other values cannot be overloaded to have special meaning.
Lars
On 2015-6-25, at 15:59, Lucy yong
Lars,
I am confused by your comment. This thread is about GRE encapsulation over IPv6
network. Not about UDP encapsulation.
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Eggert, Lars [mailto:l...@netapp.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 3:14 PM
To: Lucy yong
Cc: Ronald Bonica; int-area@ietf.org
