[Int-area] L. Eggert's comment (draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios)

2014-07-23 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi all, Lars raised a point about draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios that is basically to question whether it is worth continuing this effort if no viable solutions can be designed to solve this problem. I do agree this is a fair point. I have several comments to make here: *

Re: [Int-area] L. Eggert's comment (draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios)

2014-07-23 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Med, On 24/07/2014 00:32, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: ... * The IETF recognizes there are solutions for specific applications: RFC7239 was published after RFC6967! It isn't really a surprise that a specific application layer can add any information about the path that it

Re: [Int-area] L. Eggert's comment (draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios)

2014-07-23 Thread Joe Touch
I'd like to add some context from my viewpoint: On 7/23/2014 5:32 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: Hi all, Lars raised a point about draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios that is basically to question whether it is worth continuing this effort if no viable solutions can be