org" , "int-area@ietf.org" ,
"i...@ietf.org"
Asunto: Re: [Int-area] Using BGP to advertise SD-WAN tunnels end point's
private IPv6 addresses. (was registering tunnel types
Linda, I see a couple of issues here. Speaking as an individual.
First, IPv6 doesn't have
Fred,
How does my phone (being IPv6 address) communicate with a web server that is
IPv4 public address?
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Fred Baker [mailto:fredbaker.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 5:42 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: tom petch ; Joel Jaeggli ;
> On Nov 5, 2018, at 5:40 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>
> If a CPE-1 has private IPv6 addresses for its ports behind NAT, and CPE-2 has
> IPv4 address, can CPE-1 communicate with CPE-2 by the NAT's IPv4 address?
There is no such thing as an IPv6 private address. I'm not sure how to respond
to
Fred,
Thank you very much for the comments.
Questions to you:
If a CPE-1 has private IPv6 addresses for its ports behind NAT, and CPE-2 has
IPv4 address, can CPE-1 communicate with CPE-2 by the NAT's IPv4 address?
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Fred Baker
Linda, I see a couple of issues here. Speaking as an individual.
First, IPv6 doesn't have private addresses, and in the general case doesn't use
NATs. There is no direct counterpart to RFC 1918. The nearest parallel might be
a ULA (RFC 4193), but they are by design not routable using BGP.
