Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)

2017-04-27 Thread Ron Bonica
im.had...@ericsson.com> > Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-cha...@ietf.org" > <intarea-cha...@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping) > Message-ID: <1debf891-ea30-4989-8c24-139f6feda...@cisc

Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)

2017-04-26 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
@ericsson.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org> Cc: "intarea-cha...@ietf.org" <intarea-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping) Hi all, I like this proposal and support its adoption. Cheers, Med De : Int-area [mailto:i

Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)

2017-04-22 Thread Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
Hi, This document aims at addressing a real operational problem, describing a very useful approach. I support its adoption by Int-area. That said, three comments: 1. Given the generally applicable tool it describes, an “Implementation Status” Section [RFC 7942] ought to be included. 2.

Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)

2017-04-14 Thread Ron Bonica
Speaking as a co-author, I support it. > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:15:29 -0700 > From: Wassim Haddad > To: "int-area@ietf.org" > Cc: Wassim Haddad , > > Subject: