Thank you Ron.
On the E-bit (or P-Bit), is the important goal that it is a virtual
interface, that it is pseudowire, or ? It might help there text
indicating what a receiver might do differently based on this bit being
set or unset.
Having said that, Ethernet Pseudowire is at least a clearer
Joel,
The important piece of information is that this is a pseudowire endpoint. These
days, most pseudowire endpoints seem to be Ethernet. But some aren't. There are
still some legacy layer 2 pseudowires hanging around.
So, since we can't enumerate every type of pseudowire endpoint, we might
Good enough.
Joel
On 12/4/17 5:48 PM, Ron Bonica wrote:
Joel,
The important piece of information is that this is a pseudowire endpoint. These
days, most pseudowire endpoints seem to be Ethernet. But some aren't. There are
still some legacy layer 2 pseudowires hanging around.
So, since we
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the review. Responses inline..
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 4:45 PM
> To: gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org;
Reviewer: Stefan Winter
Review result: Has Issues
Issues:
* Introduction
states "[...] if it appears in the IPv4 Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) table
[RFC0826] or IPv6 Neighbor Cache [RFC4861]." "Appears" is a rather loose word,
as entries in those tables can have multiple states. E.g. for
