Re: [Int-area] IPv4 ID update draft

2011-09-16 Thread Joe Touch
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:58 PM, C. M. Heard he...@pobox.com wrote: Unless others can suggest why overlapping fragments should be prohibited, I'll drop this recommendation. I'm happy with the text in draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-03, except that the last sentence in Section 8.2,

Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-04.txt

2011-09-16 Thread Joe Touch
Hi, all, Here's a short summary of the changes. Joe - a few typo fixes - removed discussion on ID for ICMP validation (it never got out of the proposed stage) - changed from Cocode to mathematical expression to avoid needing a BSD-stye license (since the example wasn't intended as