Hi,
Thanks for the response. A few comments inline, with things that seem to
be closed removed:
On 6 Aug 2015, at 16:28, Ronald Bonica wrote:
[...]
[RPB]
Spenser Dawkin's DISCUSS was in the same area. He suggested that I do
something to make the judgement less subjective. Please see my
re
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : IPv6 Support for Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
Authors : Carlos Pignataro
Hi Spencer,
Good point. I am about to post a new version of the draft that addresses this
issue, as we discussed earlier today.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the thoughtful review. Responses are inline...
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 2:50 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf
Benoit,
I see your point. This document doesn't UPDATE 2784 at all. What's more, the
UPDATE flag makes the draft confusing. Later today, I will post a new version
of the draft with the UPDATE flag removed.
For those of you who care about the obsessive/compulsive details, the following
are reas
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Templin, Fred L
wrote:
> Here's an idea for GRE encapsulation in IPv6. When the Checksum Present
> bit is 1, the Checksum field contains a Checksum of the GRE header plus
> payload as usual, but the Reserved1 field encodes a checksum of the IPv6
> encapsulation head
Here's an idea for GRE encapsulation in IPv6. When the Checksum Present
bit is 1, the Checksum field contains a Checksum of the GRE header plus
payload as usual, but the Reserved1 field encodes a checksum of the IPv6
encapsulation header. Also treat Checksum value 0 as "no checksum" the
same as for
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to ht
Hi, Carlos,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpign...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Spencer,
>
> Thanks for your review and comments! Please see inline.
>
> > On Aug 4, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Spencer Dawkins <
> spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Spencer Dawkins has enter
Spencer,
Thanks for your review and comments! Please see inline.
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Spencer Dawkins
> wrote:
>
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and
Kathleen,
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 10:35 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
> wrote:
>
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To
11 matches
Mail list logo
