I would not hold money on that statement actually being true, Emmanuel ;)
Thomas
> On 29 janv. 2016, at 11:37, Emmanuel Baccelli
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
> good remark. We were so far citing OLSRv1 because of it's wider deployment to
> date compared to OLSRv2, but maybe we can also cite v2.
>
Hi Chris,
good remark. We were so far citing OLSRv1 because of it's wider deployment
to date compared to OLSRv2, but maybe we can also cite v2.
Cheers
Emmanuel
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
chris.dearl...@baesystems.com> wrote:
> The introductory section manages t
The introductory section manages to not mention the one completed Standards
Track MANET routing protocol OLSRv2 (RFC 7181).
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer
BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Laboratories
__
T
Dear all,
we have updated the draft on multi hop ad-hoc wireless communications (see
[1]), and we would be grateful for some comments.
The main changes are, according to previous feedback/discussions on the
mailing list:
- a more explicit reference and relation to RFC 3819
- an improved security
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Multi-hop Ad Hoc Wireless Communication
Authors : Emmanuel Baccelli
