Re: [Int-area] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04: (with COMMENT)

On 2/3/2017 2:13 AM, kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com wrote: > > Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > >> On Feb 3, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Rolf Winter wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Randomized hostnames might have implications in places we do not even think >> about for now, so why not take this

[Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group of the IETF. Title : Current Hostname Practice Considered Harmful Authors : Christian Huitema Da

Re: [Int-area] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04: (with COMMENT)

Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > On Feb 3, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Rolf Winter wrote: > > Hi, > > Randomized hostnames might have implications in places we do not even think > about for now, so why not take this as a mere example. Also, it seems that > the randomization might not

Re: [Int-area] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Randomized hostnames might have implications in places we do not even think about for now, so why not take this as a mere example. Also, it seems that the randomization might not be the problem but the time between changes of a name, if tracking is the only use case. How about: There are