Tom,
On 7/8/19 04:50, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:17 PM Fernando Gont wrote:
>>
>> Hello, Alissa,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments! Inline...
>>
>> On 6/8/19 23:30, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
>>>
>>> --
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:17 PM Fernando Gont wrote:
>
> Hello, Alissa,
>
> Thanks for your comments! Inline...
>
> On 6/8/19 23:30, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
> >
> > --
> > DISCUSS:
> >
On 07-Aug-19 13:06, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Brian, I would think the text just above the paragraph Alissa quoted
> would already cover what you ask for. It begins:
> Developers SHOULD NOT develop new protocols or applications that
> rely on IP fragmentation.
Well yes, so the "unless"
Hello, Alissa,
Thanks for your comments! Inline...
On 6/8/19 23:30, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
>
> --
> DISCUSS:
> --
>
> Thanks for writing this
Yeah, but that’s the rub.
If we accept the status-quo of a failure to deploy devices that allow a valid
protocol capability this way, we’ve basically deprecated it.
That’s the bad idea that we’ve tried hard to avoid, IMO.
Joe
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 6:06 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> Brian, I
Brian, I would think the text just above the paragraph Alissa quoted
would already cover what you ask for. It begins:
Developers SHOULD NOT develop new protocols or applications that
rely on IP fragmentation.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/6/2019 8:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 07-Aug-19
On 07-Aug-19 12:11, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>> On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:30 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-15: Discuss
As far as I can tell (as a mostly observer who is now shepherding this
document) the working group seemed very reluctant to get too specific
about what were or were not constrained environments where fragmentation
might (reasonably?) be expected (or not expected) to work.
I fear that trying
Hi Tom,
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:30 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
> wrote:
>>
>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-15: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:30 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-15: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC
Pete, thanks for your review. Fred, thanks for updating the text. I entered a
DISCUSS ballot to chat about Section 6.1.
Alissa
> On Jul 6, 2019, at 1:11 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 10:00, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>>> In Section 2.1 and 2.2, Instead of "set to one" and "set to
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-15: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
12 matches
Mail list logo
