On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 3:43 PM to...@strayalpha.com
wrote:
>
> Hi, Tom,
>
> > On Jan 27, 2022, at 2:46 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:17 PM to...@strayalpha.com
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> FWIW, GRO/GSO give no end of headaches to the idea of new TCP options,
> >> esp. the
Ease up, Joe - just ease up.
> -Original Message-
> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> to...@strayalpha.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:44 PM
> To: Tom Herbert
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] IP parcels
>
> EXT email:
Hi, Tom,
> On Jan 27, 2022, at 2:46 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:17 PM to...@strayalpha.com
> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, GRO/GSO give no end of headaches to the idea of new TCP options, esp.
>> the current ones to extend option space after the SYN
>>
You know, this all stems back to the "qe reset" bug - do you all remember that?
Tom might, as a former Sun guy - Bob Hinden maybe too. Or maybe that was even
before your time? I think a guy named Rusty Young helped us diagnose it. Anyone
remember him?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:17 PM to...@strayalpha.com
wrote:
>
> FWIW, GRO/GSO give no end of headaches to the idea of new TCP options, esp.
> the current ones to extend option space after the SYN
> (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo).
GRO and GSO are software implementations and in most deployments
>
>
FWIW, GRO/GSO give no end of headaches to the idea of new TCP options, esp. the
current ones to extend option space after the SYN (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo).
Although I appreciate their zeal for optimization, implementers of GRO/GSO
still need to play by the rules of TCP and UDP. It’s not clear
Hi Folks,
Thanks Christian for explaining how GSO/GRO are used by Quic
implementations. So the use is not mandated in Quic RFCs but rather used in
implementations.
I found this presentation by Intel:
On 12/20/2021 10:03 AM, Templin (US), Fred L wrote:
Tom, sorry I will try to use my words more carefully; I am using GSO/GRO also
for
a UDP-based transport protocol – not QUIC but something similar. I like GSO/GRO
very much; I am glad the service is available and I want to see it continue.
Hi Geoff, Dirk,
I wanted to add a couple of comments on your excellent points, see inline.
(trimmed a little bit of the text)
Ciao
L.
> On 27 Jan 2022, at 08:51, Dirk Trossen
> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> There is also a second factor, that of sunk cost. Nobody wants to pay to
> upgrade
