Excerpts from Jon Crowcroft on Sun, Feb 01, 2009 09:30:55AM +:
you can push info multiply redundently
(or cross-post:)
and you get reliability with a silly overhead
or you can push an update which is wrong and disconnect the entire
world, e.g.
Dino -
I think we should experimentally compare ALT with other mapping
systems
before we decide whether pull-based or push-based mapping systems are
better. Dismissing push-based mapping systems without corroborating
data would be a bit premature in my opinion.
Agree.
In the absence of
On Jan 28, 2009, Dino Farinacci wrote:
You cannot push around 10^10 entries and store them everywhere. [...]
Dino -
I think we should experimentally compare ALT with other mapping systems
before we decide whether pull-based or push-based mapping systems are
better. Dismissing push-based
Jari Arkko:
In particular, I would like to know how people
feel about this work being ready for an (Experimental) IETF
WG, what the scope should be, whether the charter is
reasonable. And if not, what would make it so.
+1 for an Experimental IETF WG scoped to develop an RFC series on
On 1/20/09 7:59 PM, Schliesser, Benson bens...@savvis.net wrote:
Jari Arkko:
In particular, I would like to know how people
feel about this work being ready for an (Experimental) IETF
WG, what the scope should be, whether the charter is
reasonable. And if not, what would make it so.
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Schliesser, Benson wrote:
The most recent charter proposed by Dave Meyer looks good to me.
aye___
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
Hi Ross,
It seems to me that you and Dimitri are talking about things that
the RRG should be doing as it moves towards conclusions. I don't see
why they would be in scope for an IETF LISP WG, where we would ask
for a tight and achievable focus.
Obviously there's a risk in chartering a LISP WG
Jari,
But back to the proposal. In particular, I would like to know how
people feel about this work being ready for an (Experimental) IETF WG,
what the scope should be, whether the charter is reasonable. And if
not, what would make it so.
There are reasonably stable specs that people can
