On 2/12/13 5:34 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear Brian,
Many thanks for the detailed review.
Please see inline.
Cheers, Med
-Message d'origine- De : int-area-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Brian Haberman
Envoyé : lundi 11 février 2013
On 2/13/13 1:16 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Brian,
On 02/11/2013 07:44 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
Hi Suresh,
On 2/11/13 7:08 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the review. I wanted to clarify three points that you
raised and I will ask the authors take care of the rest.
On
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Brian Haberman [mailto:br...@innovationslab.net]
Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2013 16:04
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN
Cc : int-area@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analy...@tools.ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Int-area] AD
Hi Suresh,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Suresh Krishnan
suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi Behcet,
On 02/12/2013 05:57 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Hi Suresh,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Suresh Krishnan
suresh.krish...@ericsson.com mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com
Hi Behcet,
I have two comments:
* Host identification issue is valid for any address sharing mechanism. This is
why the introduction mentions already the following:
As reported in [RFC6269https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6269], several
issues are encountered when an IP
address is shared
On 2/13/13 11:12 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
I would suggest re-ordering the table so that deployed approaches are
collected together (and labeling them as deployed). If the HTTP
Forwarded header is the only deployed approach, I would simply add a
note for the others stating
Hi Med,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:43 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
**
Hi Behcet,
I have two comments:
* Host identification issue is valid for any address sharing mechanism.
I am not sure on A+P?
A+P requires point-to-point link, right?
This is why the introduction mentions
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2013 18:01
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN
Cc : Suresh Krishnan; Brian Haberman;
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analy...@tools.ietf.org;
Hi Med,
I think that email discussions we had on this issue in fmc list last year
will provide good context in these discussions, please remember them.
See inline:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:16 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
**
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
On 2/11/2013 4:08 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the review. I wanted to clarify three points that you
raised and I will ask the authors take care of the rest.
On 02/11/2013 04:11 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
7. In Section 4.1.2, it would be good to describe any issues that
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host
Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments
11 matches
Mail list logo
