added upstream suggestion to error message in case xorg macros or
xserver macros are missing. removed package manager references in
suggestion since these are 'user' and/or 'distribution' preferences.
---
configure.ac |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c
> -Original Message-
> From: intel-gfx-bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:intel-gfx-
> bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Julien Cristau
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:54 PM
> To: Paul Menzel
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.fre
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 23:49:31 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> `aptitude` is the recommended package manager for Debian [1].
I don't believe that's true. But it's kind of irrelevant anyway, it
should be enough to give the name of the package to install.
Cheers,
Julien
Doesn't actually work right now, but I did manage to get into rc6 once
and see a lot of power savings (over 1W).
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 27 +++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:37:01 -0800 (PST), ic...@kemper.freedesktop.org (Chris
Wilson) wrote:
> [Modified version of U. Artie Eoff's commit to remove the duplicated
> string. The paraphrased commit message is repeated below for
> clarity.]
Close. But if you look a *bit* more closely yo
Dear Artie,
Am Dienstag, den 21.12.2010, 15:10 -0700 schrieb U. Artie Eoff:
> Added m4 check for XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT macro definition. Updated m4
> fatal messages to give better hint on how to resolve error when xorg
> macros are missing. Previously, configure would continue in spite of
> the
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:22:30 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:10:41 -0700, "U. Artie Eoff"
> wrote:
> > Added m4 check for XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT macro definition. Updated m4
> > fatal messages to give better hint on how to resolve error when xorg
> > macros are missing. Previo
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:10:41 -0700, "U. Artie Eoff"
wrote:
> Added m4 check for XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT macro definition. Updated m4
> fatal messages to give better hint on how to resolve error when xorg
> macros are missing. Previously, configure would continue in spite of
> the missing macros a
Added m4 check for XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT macro definition. Updated m4 fatal
messages to give better hint on how to resolve error when xorg macros are
missing. Previously, configure would continue in spite of the missing macros
and the build would fail for syntax errors.
---
configure.ac |
This patch actually makes the watermark code even uglier (if that's
possible), but has the advantage of sharing code between SNB and ILK at
least. Longer term we should refactor the watermark stuff into its own
file and clean it up now that we know how it's supposed to work.
Supporting WM2 on my
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:55:15 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> The test we do is simply whether the LVDS i2c pins are addressable. That
> requires differentiating between an IO error and a NAK, which at present
> is only possible using GMBUS. The reference to this method I found in the
> BIOS writers
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:14:51 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:36:44 +, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > I think once upon a time I found a reliable method in the docs:
> > intel_lvds_ddc_probe(). However that only seemed to work over GMBUS...
>
> That probably depends on the
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:36:44 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> I think once upon a time I found a reliable method in the docs:
> intel_lvds_ddc_probe(). However that only seemed to work over GMBUS...
That probably depends on the panel having DDC, which many don't, right?
Maybe we can assume the SDV
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:53:14 -0800, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:43:38 +1000
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Jesse Barnes
> > wrote:
> > > Add a DMI match entry for the SDV to indicate it has no LVDS present.
> >
> > Sounds wrong, generally the SDV
14 matches
Mail list logo
