On Thursday 11 August 2011 04:16:48 Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/08/11 03:45 (GMT+0200) Dexter Filmore composed:
Actually, right now about *all* these problems could be solved by moving
the machine to Win7.
Are you sure? Is it possible only HDMI-1 works at 120, and the others at
60? Did
Well, that all looks fine. And I also can't see any way that this commit
could cause the backlight not to appear - all it does is set the parent
if it's present. There's no new path that could cause it to return
early. Does reverting this patch really make things work?
--
Matthew Garrett |
On 2011/08/11 10:10 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
and if that didn't work, also adding
OptionTargetRefreshRate 60
That was supposed to be
Option TargetRefreshRate 50.
--
The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ali Gholami Rudi aliqr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0700 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Matthew -- shall I just merge the old patch? Or did you want to make
some changes?
I have a
Set both the PM core interrupt regs and the PM specific interrupt maks
to only allow interrupts we handle. This prevents spurious interrupts
and just makes more sense.
v2: use a mask for the mask reg
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
This resurrects Chris's old code to better manage the PCH reference
clock. With some previous mode setting bugs fixed, it appears work work
now.
v2: fix compile error
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |1 +
We ought to be calling this from our DPMS routines as well as global
state may change and we need to enable/disable clocks. So split out the
code in preparation for further changes.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 119
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:36:38 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Since there's no known regression introduced by Matthew's patch, could
it be merged? Feel free to add a
I've had to amend the patch a bit to get it to apply on top of
drm-intel-fixes; anyone care to
These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking maps. I
haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot this down before I
waste more time :).
Ben
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h|2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |4
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index a546a71..8e14fbe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
---
intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 49 +++--
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index 4f4de92..7431ed9 100644
---
Oops. The previous patch was the wrong one.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h|2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |7 +++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:56:21PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking
maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot
this down
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:28 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
I've had to amend the patch a bit to get it to apply on top of
drm-intel-fixes; anyone care to take a look and see if it still looks
reasonable (and/or actually works?)
Hi Keith-
I confirm that this does indeed work (Dell Studio 1558).
15 matches
Mail list logo