Re: [Intel-gfx] How can I set non-60Hz-Modes?

2011-08-11 Thread Dexter Filmore
On Thursday 11 August 2011 04:16:48 Felix Miata wrote: On 2011/08/11 03:45 (GMT+0200) Dexter Filmore composed: Actually, right now about *all* these problems could be solved by moving the machine to Win7. Are you sure? Is it possible only HDMI-1 works at 120, and the others at 60? Did

Re: [Intel-gfx] missing acpi backlight bisected to 9661e92c10

2011-08-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
Well, that all looks fine. And I also can't see any way that this commit could cause the backlight not to appear - all it does is set the parent if it's present. There's no new path that could cause it to return early. Does reverting this patch really make things work? -- Matthew Garrett |

Re: [Intel-gfx] How can I set non-60Hz-Modes?

2011-08-11 Thread Felix Miata
On 2011/08/11 10:10 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed: and if that didn't work, also adding OptionTargetRefreshRate 60 That was supposed to be Option TargetRefreshRate 50. -- The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 native backlight never got merged

2011-08-11 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ali Gholami Rudi aliqr...@gmail.com wrote: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote: On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0700 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: Matthew -- shall I just merge the old patch? Or did you want to make some changes? I have a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: limit PM related interrupt enable to those we handle

2011-08-11 Thread Jesse Barnes
Set both the PM core interrupt regs and the PM specific interrupt maks to only allow interrupts we handle. This prevents spurious interrupts and just makes more sense. v2: use a mask for the mask reg Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable/disable spread spectrum as needed on mode set

2011-08-11 Thread Jesse Barnes
This resurrects Chris's old code to better manage the PCH reference clock. With some previous mode setting bugs fixed, it appears work work now. v2: fix compile error Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |1 +

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: split out PCH refclk update code

2011-08-11 Thread Jesse Barnes
We ought to be calling this from our DPMS routines as well as global state may change and we need to enable/disable clocks. So split out the code in preparation for further changes. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 119

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 native backlight never got merged

2011-08-11 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:36:38 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Since there's no known regression introduced by Matthew's patch, could it be merged? Feel free to add a I've had to amend the patch a bit to get it to apply on top of drm-intel-fixes; anyone care to

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot this down before I waste more time :). Ben ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: add assumed cpu-dirtied flush

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h|2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |4 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Assume size 1 means WO map (hack)

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index a546a71..8e14fbe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: hack to allow WO mappings

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net --- intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 49 +++-- 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c index 4f4de92..7431ed9 100644 ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: add assumed cpu-dirtied flush

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
Oops. The previous patch was the wrong one. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h|2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |7 +++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:56:21PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot this down

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 native backlight never got merged

2011-08-11 Thread Kamal Mostafa
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:28 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: I've had to amend the patch a bit to get it to apply on top of drm-intel-fixes; anyone care to take a look and see if it still looks reasonable (and/or actually works?) Hi Keith- I confirm that this does indeed work (Dell Studio 1558).