On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:56:58AM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Also IVB, model 58?
Yes.
Right, so it must be chipset-specific.
Dunno. What do you mean by pm callbacks exactly? I don't know that
code so I have to ask.
power management callbacks.
Ok, just as I thought. But why
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:11:47PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
i915gm and i945gm also seem to use and need the legacy combination mode
bit in BLC_PWM_CTL.
v2: Also do this for i915gm (Ville).
Reported-and-tested-by: Luis Ortega luior...@gmail.com
Bugzilla:
To expose the panel fitter for arbitrary use by User-space, we will expose the
manual scaling ratio Input/Src size info to User, apart from the available
scaling modes like Full screen, Centered, Aspect.
Please suggest that how shall we extend the current interface to incorporate
these extra
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:32:44PM +, Goel, Akash wrote:
To expose the panel fitter for arbitrary use by User-space, we will expose
the manual scaling ratio Input/Src size info to User, apart from the
available scaling modes like Full screen, Centered, Aspect.
You can simply add new
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 05:24:00 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
This started happening this morning after booting -rc4+tip, let's
add *everybody* to CC :-)
What about -rc4 without tip?
I don't think so because
commit
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:32:44PM +, Goel, Akash wrote:
To expose the panel fitter for arbitrary use by User-space, we will expose
the manual scaling ratio Input/Src size info to User, apart from the
available scaling modes like Full screen, Centered, Aspect.
Please suggest that how
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
This adds a small benchmark for the new userptr functionality.
Apart from basic surface creation and destruction, also tested is the
impact of having userptr surfaces in the process address space. Reason
for that is the impact of MMU notifiers on
On 02/21/2014 06:45 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
[snip]
v20: Refuse to implement read-only support until we have the required
infrastructure - but reserve the bit in flags for future use.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com
Cc:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
A set of userptr test cases to support the new feature.
For the eviction and swapping stress testing I have extracted
some common behaviour from gem_evict_everything and made both
test cases use it to avoid duplicating the code.
Both unsynchronized
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
This patch series replaces the old vmap with the new userptr test case
and also adds a benchmark for the new feature.
Tested against version 20 of the kernel patch.
Tvrtko Ursulin (3):
tests/gem_userptr_blits: Expanded userptr test cases
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
No need for the old test case once the new one was added.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
---
tests/.gitignore | 1 -
tests/Makefile.sources | 1 -
tests/gem_vmap_blits.c | 344
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530
akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
From: Akash Goel akash.g...@intel.com
There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because
some BIOS are wrapping the stolen area in the root PCI bus, but
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
Allow userptr objects to be created and used via libdrm_intel.
At the moment tiling and mapping to GTT aperture is not supported
due hardware limitations across different generations and uncertainty
about its usefulness.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:58 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:29:44 +0200
Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:02:20AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
Based on an early draft from Jesse.
Add support for powering on/off the dynamic
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:03:31 +0200
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
The irq flags state is already established by the outer
spin_lock_irqsave(); re-disabling irqs is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
---
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:03:32 +0200
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Currently there's one per-device vblank disable timer, and it gets
reset wheneven the vblank refcount for any crtc drops to zero. That
means that one crtc could
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:58:26 +0900
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
We can kill of
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:03:33 +0200
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Allow the driver to specify whether all new vblank requests after
drm_vblank_off() should be rejected. And add a counterpart called
drm_vblank_on() which will again
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:02:19 +0200
Imre Deak imre.d...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:58 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:29:44 +0200
Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:02:20AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
Based on
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Jani Nikula jani.nik...@intel.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Backport of upstream commit c91c9f328
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 31
20 matches
Mail list logo
