Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-10 Thread Jörg Otte
2014-05-09 19:03 GMT+02:00 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the issue and then attach the complete

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] Documentation: drm: describing drm properties exposed by various drivers

2014-05-10 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:25:06PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Sagar, On Wednesday 12 March 2014 16:46:05 Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 15:36 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Monday 10 March 2014 06:21:49 Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:56 AM,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] Documentation: drm: describing drm properties exposed by various drivers

2014-05-10 Thread Rob Clark
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:25:06PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Sagar, On Wednesday 12 March 2014 16:46:05 Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 15:36 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Monday

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Add variable gem object size support to i915

2014-05-10 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 09/05/2014 22:18, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:01:29AM -0700, arun.siluv...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Siluvery, Arun arun.siluv...@intel.com This patch adds support to have gem objects of variable size. The size of the gem object obj-size is always constant and

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use hash tables for the command parser

2014-05-10 Thread bradley . d . volkin
From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com For clients that submit large batch buffers the command parser has a substantial impact on performance. On my HSW ULT system performance drops as much as ~20% on some tests. Most of the time is spent in the command lookup code. Converting that from the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-05-10 Thread bradley . d . volkin
From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this bit is not required for the actual test case. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76670 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com --- This is a resend